NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934
Filed by the Registrant þ
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o
Check the appropriate box:
|
|
|
o
|
|
Preliminary Proxy Statement |
o
|
|
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
þ
|
|
Definitive Proxy Statement |
o
|
|
Definitive Additional Materials |
o
|
|
Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12 |
Marshall Edwards, Inc.
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
|
|
|
þ
|
|
No fee required. |
o
|
|
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11. |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to
Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and
state how it was determined): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5) Total fee paid: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
o
|
|
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
|
|
|
o
|
|
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange
Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting
fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration
statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Amount Previously Paid: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3) Filing Party: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4) Date Filed: |
|
|
|
|
Marshall
Edwards, Inc.
140 Wicks Road
North Ryde, New South Wales 2113
Australia
October 30, 2006
Dear Marshall Edwards Stockholder:
You are cordially invited to attend the 2006 Annual Meeting of
the Stockholders of Marshall Edwards, Inc., a Delaware
corporation. The Annual Meeting will be held on Tuesday,
December 12, 2006, commencing at 1:00 pm (local time) at
the offices of Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP, located at
1111 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, D.C. 20004. We
look forward to meeting with as many of our stockholders as
possible.
At the meeting, we will (i) elect two directors,
(ii) act upon a proposal to ratify the appointment of our
independent auditors for the fiscal year ending June 30,
2007 and (iii) act upon a proposal to approve the issuance
of our Common Stock to Cornell Capital Partners, LP pursuant to
the Standby Equity Distribution Agreement entered into by us and
Cornell Capital Partners, LP on July 11, 2006. There will
also be a report on our business, and you will have an
opportunity to ask questions about the Company.
It is important that your shares be represented at the meeting.
Whether or not you plan to attend in person, you are invited to
complete, sign, date and return the enclosed proxy in the
envelope provided.
The Companys Annual Report for the fiscal year ended
June 30, 2006 is being mailed to you together with the
enclosed proxy materials.
Yours sincerely,
/s/ Christopher Naughton
Christopher Naughton
President and Chief Executive Officer
MARSHALL
EDWARDS, INC.
140 Wicks Road
North Ryde, New South Wales 2113
Australia
Notice of Annual Meeting of
Stockholders
To Be Held on December 12, 2006
October 30, 2006
To the Stockholders of Marshall Edwards, Inc.:
Notice is hereby given that the Annual Meeting of Stockholders
of Marshall Edwards, Inc., a Delaware corporation, has been
called and will be held on Tuesday, December 12, 2006, at
1:00 pm (local time) at Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP,
located at 111 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, D.C.
20004, for the following purposes:
1. To elect two members to the Board of Directors;
2. To ratify the appointment of our independent auditors
for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2007;
3. To vote upon a proposal to approve the issuance of our
Common Stock to Cornell Capital Partners, LP pursuant to the
Standby Equity Distribution Agreement entered into by us and
Cornell Capital Partners, LP on July 11, 2006; and
4. To consider and act on such matters as may properly come
before the Annual Meeting and any adjournment thereof.
Only stockholders of record at the close of business on
October 23, 2006, will be entitled to notice of and to vote
at the Annual Meeting and at any adjournment thereof.
BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
/s/ David R. Seaton
David R. Seaton
Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
WHETHER OR NOT YOU EXPECT TO ATTEND IN PERSON, WE URGE YOU TO
COMPLETE, SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THE ENCLOSED PROXY CARD AT YOUR
EARLIEST CONVENIENCE. YOU MAY RETURN YOUR PROXY CARD IN THE
ENCLOSED ENVELOPE (NO POSTAGE IS REQUIRED IF MAILED IN THE
UNITED STATES).
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
i
MARSHALL
EDWARDS, INC.
140 Wicks Road
North Ryde, New South Wales 2113
Australia
PROXY
STATEMENT
This Proxy Statement is being furnished in connection with the
solicitation of Proxies by and on behalf of the Board of
Directors of Marshall Edwards, Inc. (the Company) to
be used at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on
Tuesday, December 12, 2006, and at any adjournment thereof
(the Annual Meeting), for the purposes set forth in
the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting. The Companys
Annual Report for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2006
accompanies this Proxy Statement. This Proxy Statement and the
accompanying materials are expected to be first sent or given to
stockholders of the Company on or about October 31, 2006.
The close of business on October 23, 2006 has been fixed as
the record date for the determination of the stockholders
entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting. Only
holders of record as of that date of shares of the
Companys common stock, $0.00000002 par value per
share (the Common Stock), are entitled to notice of
and to vote at the Annual Meeting.
Each share of the Common Stock entitles the holder thereof to
one vote per share on each matter presented to the stockholders
for approval at the Annual Meeting. On October 23, 2006,
there were 63,390,937 shares of Common Stock outstanding
and entitled to vote.
Execution of a Proxy by a stockholder will not affect such
stockholders right to attend the Annual Meeting and to
vote in person. Any stockholder who executes a Proxy has a right
to revoke it at any time before it is voted by advising David R.
Seaton, Secretary of the Company, in writing of such revocation,
by executing a later-dated Proxy which is presented to the
Company at or prior to the Annual Meeting or by appearing at the
Annual Meeting and voting in person. Attendance at the Annual
Meeting will not in and of itself constitute revocation of a
Proxy. Please note, however, that if your shares are held of
record by a bank, broker or other agent and you wish to vote at
the Annual Meeting, you must obtain a proxy issued in your name
from that record holder.
The presence, in person or by Proxy, of the holders of one-third
of the shares of the Common Stock entitled to vote at the Annual
Meeting will constitute a quorum. Assuming a quorum is met, each
nominee for director who receives a plurality of the votes cast
by holders of the shares of Common Stock voting in person or by
proxy at the Annual Meeting will be elected as a director. The
proposal to ratify the appointment of BDO as the Companys
independent auditors for the fiscal year ended June 30,
2007 will require approval by the majority of the votes cast by
the holders of the shares of Common Stock voting in person or by
proxy at the Annual Meeting. The proposal to approve the
issuance of shares of Common Stock to Cornell Capital Partners,
LP (Cornell Capital) under the Standby Equity
Distribution Agreement (the SEDA) entered into by
the Company and Cornell on July 11, 2006 will require
approval by a majority of the votes cast by holders of the
shares of Common Stock voting in person or by proxy at the
Annual Meeting.
With regard to the election of directors, votes may be cast in
favor or withheld. Votes that are withheld and broker non-votes,
if any, will be counted for purposes of determining the presence
or absence of a quorum, but will have no effect on the election
of directors. You may vote either for or against or abstain from
voting on the proposal to ratify the selection of BDO as the
Companys independent auditors. Abstentions and broker
non-votes, if any, will be counted for the purposes of
determining the presence or absence of a quorum, but will have
no effect on the ratification of BDO as the Companys
independent auditors. You may vote either for or against or
abstain from voting on the proposal to approve the issuance of
the Companys Common Stock to Cornell Capital pursuant to
the SEDA. Abstentions and broker non-votes, if any, will be
counted for the purposes of determining the presence or absence
of a quorum, but will have no effect on the approval of the
issuance of the Companys Common Stock to Cornell Capital
pursuant to the SEDA.
Unless specified otherwise, the Proxies will be voted
(i) FOR the election of all the nominees to serve as
directors of the Company until the annual meeting in 2009 and
until their successors are duly elected and qualified,
(ii) FOR the ratification of the appointment of BDO as the
Companys independent auditors and (iii) FOR the
issuance of the Companys Common Stock to Cornell Capital
pursuant to with the SEDA. In the discretion of the Proxy
holders, the Proxies will also be voted for or against such
other matters as may properly come before the Annual Meeting.
Management is not aware of any other matters to be presented for
action at the Annual Meeting.
PROPOSAL 1
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
Below are the two nominees for election to the Board of
Directors to serve for terms expiring at the annual meeting in
2009 and until their respective successors have been duly
elected and qualified. The Companys restated certificate
of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws provide that
the authorized number of directors shall be determined by a
resolution of the Board of Directors, but shall be between two
and nine. The number of directors on the Board of Directors is
currently fixed at six. Also, under the Companys restated
certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws,
the Companys Board of Directors is divided into three
classes, with the classes serving three-year staggered terms.
Each class contains one-third (or if that number is not a whole
number, the whole number nearest one-third) of the directors,
with members of each class holding office for a three-year term.
Currently there are two directors whose terms expire in 2007,
two directors whose terms expire in 2008 and two directors whose
terms will expire at the Annual Meeting in 2006.
The presence, in person or by Proxy, of the holders of one-third
of the shares of the Common Stock entitled to vote at the Annual
Meeting will constitute a quorum. Assuming a quorum is met, each
nominee for director who receives a plurality of the votes cast
by holders of the shares of Common Stock voting in person or by
proxy at the Annual Meeting will be elected as a director. Votes
may be cast in favor or withheld. Votes that are withheld and
broker non-votes, if any, will be counted for purposes of
determining the presence or absence of a quorum, but will have
no effect on the election of directors.
Nominees
The following table sets forth information, as of
October 23, 2006, regarding the nominees.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Positions Held
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
with Company
|
|
Stephen Breckenridge
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
Director
|
Professor Bryan Williams
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
Director
|
Business
Experience of Nominees
Stephen
Breckenridge, age 64, Director
M
Tax, FCA, FTIA
Mr. Breckenridge has been one of the Companys
directors since August 2003. Mr. Breckenridge has had over
25 years of experience in public practice as a chartered
accountant in Australia and, since July 2004, has been the head
of international transfer pricing for Australia and Asia at
Baker & McKenzie (a global law firm) in Sydney.
Mr. Breckenridge has been managing director of Breckenridge
Consulting Pty Ltd since 2001, which provides independent tax
and management advice to multi-nationals and small and medium
enterprises, (SMEs). Until 2001, Mr. Breckenridge was
a tax partner for 24 years with KPMG in Sydney where he
provided corporate tax advice to a wide cross section of
businesses in Australia and overseas with particular emphasis in
later years on international transfer pricing.
Mr. Breckenridge has also been involved in the
pharmaceutical and chemical industries over a long period
including several industry association committees and leading
industry focus groups within KPMG. From 2003 to 2004,
Mr. Breckenridge was employed by Pitcher Partners Pty Ltd.,
an accounting firm in Sydney where he provided international tax
advice to a broad range of businesses. Mr. Breckenridge has
been a member of the Australian Institute of Company Directors
since May 2006. Mr. Breckenridge holds a Master
2
of Tax degree from the University of Sydney and is a fellow of
the Institute of Chartered Accountants and the Tax Institute of
Australia. Mr. Breckenridges term as a director
expires at the annual meeting in 2006.
Professor
Bryan Williams, age 57, Director
Professor Bryan Williams has been one of the Companys
directors since March 2006 when he was appointed by the
Companys Board to fill the vacancy created by the
resignation of Professor David de Kretser from the Board of
Directors. Professor Williams has over 30 years of
experience in basic and pre-clinical cancer research. Since
January 1, 2006, Professor Williams has been the director
of the Monash Institute of Medical Research in Melbourne,
Australia. From 1991 to 2005, Professor Williams was Chairman of
the Department of Cancer Biology, Lerner Research Institute, The
Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio. From 1993 to 2005,
Professor Williams was Professor, Department of Genetics at Case
Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio. From 1998 to 2005,
Professor Williams was an Adjunct Professor in the Departments
of Chemistry at Cleveland State University and Kent State
University, also both in Ohio. Professor Williams holds a B.Sc.
(Hons)(Microbiology) and PhD (Microbiology) from the University
of Otago, New Zealand. He is an Honorary Fellow of the Royal
Society of New Zealand. Professor Williams term as a
director expires at the annual meeting in 2006.
The Board of Directors unanimously recommends that you vote
FOR the election of Stephen Breckenridge and
Professor Bryan Williams as directors of the Company.
Business
Experience of Members of the Board of Directors Continuing in
Office
Members
Whose Terms Expire at the Annual Meeting in 2007
Mr. Philip
Johnston, age 59, Director
Dip
Eng (Production)
Mr. Johnston has been a director since April 2001.
Mr. Johnston has more than 25 years of experience in
the pharmaceutical industry. He has been a non-executive
director of Novogen Limited (Novogen), the
Companys parent, since 1997 and chairman of Novogen since
January 2001. Since June 2004, Mr. Johnston has been a
non-executive director of LIPA Pharmaceuticals Limited. He is
also the managing director of Qualcare Management Pty. Ltd.
Mr. Johnston has been a director of Glycotex, Inc.
(Glycotex), a subsidiary of Novogen, since
September 2005. From June 1988 to September 1997,
Mr. Johnston was an executive director of Wellcome
Australia Limited. He was previously a director of two
subsidiary companies of GlaxoWellcome. He has had responsibility
for production, distribution, quality assurance and consumer
product development and has been directly involved in the
establishment of strategic alliances and joint ventures.
Mr. Johnston has completed a number of executive
development programs including programs at the University of New
South Wales and the London Business School.
Professor
Paul John Nestel, age 76, Director
AO
MD, FTSE, FRACP, FAHA, FCSAND
Professor Nestel has been a director since April 2001. Professor
Nestel has been a non-executive director of Novogen since
September 2001. Since January 1995, Professor Nestel has been
senior principal research fellow and head of the cardiovascular
nutrition laboratory at the Baker Medical Research Institute,
Victoria. Professor Nestel has also been a consultant physician
at the Alfred Hospital, Melbourne. He is president of the
International Life Sciences Institute (Australasia) and is a
member of the board of directors of ILSI South East Asia. He was
formally a clinical professor in medicine at The Flinders
University of South Australia. Professor Nestel is an Officer of
the Order of Australia.
Members
Whose Terms Expire at the Annual Meeting in 2008
Christopher
Naughton, age 53, Director
BEc,
LLB
Mr. Naughton has been President, Chief Executive Officer
and director of the Company since the Companys inception
in December 2000. Mr. Naughton has been the Managing
Director of Novogen since March 1997.
3
Mr. Naughton was appointed Chairman of Glycotex in
September 2005. Mr. Naughton received degrees in Economics
from the Australian National University and in Law from the
University of New South Wales. He completed the Program for
Management Development at the Harvard Business School and is
admitted to practice as an attorney in New South Wales. After
working in merchant banking, he has spent the past 20 years
in the pharmaceutical industry including appointments as a
director of Wellcome Australia Limited and in world-wide
business development with the Wellcome Foundation Limited in the
UK.
Professor
Graham E. Kelly, age 61, Director
BSc(Vet),
BVSc, PhD
Professor Kelly was appointed Chairman of the Board of Directors
in 2000. Professor Kelly is the founder and the first managing
director of Novogen. Professor Kelly was chairman of Novogen
from March 1997 until December 31, 2000. Professor Kelly
was an executive director of Novogen from 1994 to September 2005
and is currently the Oncology Research Director of Novogen, a
position he has held since 2000. Professor Kelly was chairman of
Glycotex from 1997 to September 2005. Professor Kelly has spent
nearly 30 years in medical research involving drug
development, immunology, surgery and cancer. Professor Kelly was
Senior Research Fellow in Experimental Surgery in the Faculty of
Medicine at the University of Sydney and was appointed an
Adjunct Professor of the University of Sydney in May 2004. He
developed the (1-3)(1-6)--glucan and isoflavone intellectual
property now owned by Novogen.
Professor Kelly is one of a number of individuals who, and whose
associated entities and advisors, have been the subject of
investigations by certain Australian authorities relative to
their alleged involvement in the evasion of Australian tax,
fraud and money laundering. Professor Kelly has informed the
Company that he does not believe that he has committed any
wrongdoing and denies that he has been involved in any
wrongdoing.
Information
About the Board of Directors and its Committees
The Board of Directors has responsibility for the overall
corporate governance of the Company.
Three of the six Board members are also currently directors of
Novogen. The Company is a controlled corporation
within the meaning given to that term by Nasdaq because Novogen
owns more than 50% of the Companys voting power. As a
controlled corporation, the Company is exempt from the
requirement that the Companys Board be composed of a
majority of independent directors, however, a majority of the
members of the Board of Directors are independent in accordance
with Nasdaq requirements.
The Board of Directors held a total of eleven meetings during
the fiscal year ended June 30, 2006. Each incumbent
director attended at least 75% of the total number of meetings
of the Board of Directors and the total number of meetings held
by the committees of the Board of Directors on which each
incumbent director served, in each case during the periods in
which he served. In addition to regularly scheduled meetings,
the directors discharge their responsibility through telephone
and other communications with each other and with the executive
officers. As required under The Nasdaq Stock Market listing
standards, the independent directors meet in regularly scheduled
executive sessions at which only independent directors are
present, in conjunction with regularly scheduled meetings of the
Board of Directors. All of the directors are expected to attend
the Companys annual meeting of stockholders. Five of the
Companys six directors attended the 2005 annual meeting of
stockholders.
The Board has established an Audit Committee to oversee the
Companys financial matters and a Remuneration Committee to
review the performance of executive directors and their
remuneration.
Effective March 31, 2006, Professor David de Kretser
resigned from the Companys Board of Directors and the
Board appointed Professor Bryan Williams to fill the vacancy
created by Professor de Kretsers resignation. Professor
Williams also assumed Professor de Kretsers positions on
the Audit Committee and the Remuneration Committee.
Audit
Committee
The Audit Committee is responsible for overseeing financial and
accounting activities. The Audit Committees
responsibilities include the annual appointment of independent
auditors and the review of the scope of audit and
4
non-audit assignments and related fees, the accounting
principles used in financial reporting, internal auditing and
the Companys internal control procedures. The members of
the Audit Committee are Mr. Stephen Breckenridge
(chairman), Mr. Philip Johnston, Professor Bryan Williams
and Professor Paul John Nestel, all of whom are independent as
defined by applicable Nasdaq and U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC) rules. The Board of
Directors has also determined that Mr. Stephen Breckenridge
is an audit committee financial expert as defined by
SEC rules. The Company has adopted a written audit committee
charter which is available on the Companys website at
www.marshalledwardsinc.com.
The Audit Committee held four meetings during the fiscal year
ended June 30, 2006.
Remuneration
Committee
The Remuneration Committee generally reviews the performance of
the executive directors and sets their remuneration. The
Remuneration Committee also has the power to make
recommendations to the full Board concerning the allocation of
share options to directors and employees. The remuneration and
terms of appointment of non-executive directors is set by the
Board of Directors. The members of the Remuneration Committee
are Mr. Philip Johnston, Professor Bryan Williams,
Mr. Stephen Breckenridge and Professor Paul John Nestel.
Because the Company has no employees and no remuneration was
paid directly to the Chief Executive Officer or to any of the
other executive officers of the Company, there were no meetings
of the Remuneration Committee held during the fiscal year ended
June 30, 2006.
Nominating
Committee
As a controlled corporation, the Company is not
subject to the Nasdaq rules requiring (i) Board of Director
nominations to be selected, or recommended for the Boards
selection, by either a nominating committee comprised solely of
independent directors or by a majority of the independent
directors on the Board, and (ii) each Nasdaq-listed company
to have a formal written charter or Board resolutions addressing
the nominating process. Accordingly, during the year ended
June 30, 2006, the Company did not have a separately
established Nominating Committee. The Board of Directors does
not believe that any marked efficiencies or enhancements would
be achieved by the creation of a separate Nominating Committee.
The duties and responsibilities typically delegated to a
nominating committee are included in the responsibilities of the
entire Board of Directors. The Board of Directors identifies
nominees by first evaluating the current members of the Board of
Directors willing to continue in service. If any member of the
Board of Directors does not wish to continue in service or if
the Board of Directors decides not to re-nominate a member for
re-election, the Board will consider all qualified director
candidates identified by members of the Board, by senior
management and stockholders. Stockholders who would like to
propose an independent director candidate for consideration by
the Board of Directors may do so by submitting the
candidates name, résumé and biographical
information to the attention of David R. Seaton, Secretary of
the Company, Marshall Edwards, Inc., 140 Wicks Road, North Ryde,
New South Wales, 2113, Australia, no later than the deadline for
submission of stockholder proposals set forth under the section
of this Proxy Statement entitled Stockholder Proposals for
the 2007 Annual Meeting. All proposals for nomination
received by the Secretary of the Company will be presented to
the Board of Directors for consideration.
The Board of Directors reviews each director candidates
biographical information and assesses each candidates
independence, skills and expertise based on a variety of
factors, including the following criteria:
|
|
|
|
|
Whether the candidate has exhibited behavior that indicates he
or she is committed to the highest ethical standards.
|
|
|
|
Whether the candidate has had broad business, governmental,
non-profit or professional experience that indicates that the
candidate will be able to make a significant and immediate
contribution to the Board of Directors discussion and
decision-making.
|
|
|
|
Whether the candidate will be able to devote sufficient time and
energy to the performance of his or her duties as a director.
|
5
Application of these factors requires the exercise of judgment
by members of the Board of Directors and cannot be measured in a
quantitative way.
Communications
with the Board of Directors
The stockholders may communicate with the Board of Directors,
including non-executive directors or officers, by sending
written communications addressed to such person or persons in
care of Marshall Edwards, Inc., 140 Wicks Road, North Ryde
NSW 2113, Australia. All communications will be compiled by the
Secretary and submitted to the addressee. If the Board of
Directors modifies this process, the revised process will be
posted on the Companys website.
PROPOSAL 2
RATIFICATION OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
The Audit Committee and the Board of Directors have selected BDO
as independent auditors to audit the financial statements of the
Company for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2007. The Board
of Directors is submitting the appointment of BDO to the
stockholders for ratification as a matter of good corporate
practice.
The ratification of the appointment of BDO as the Companys
independent auditors for the fiscal year ended June 30,
2007 will require approval by the majority of the votes cast by
the holders of the shares of Common Stock voting in person or by
proxy at the Annual Meeting. Stockholders may vote either for or
against or abstain from voting on the proposal to ratify the
selection of BDO as the Companys independent auditors.
Abstentions and broker non-votes, if any, will be counted for
the purposes of determining the presence or absence of a quorum,
but will have no effect on the ratification of BDO as the
Companys independent auditors for the fiscal year ended
June 30, 2007.
In the event that the stockholders fail to ratify the
appointment, the Audit Committee will reconsider its selection
of audit firms, but may decide not to change its selection. Even
if the appointment is ratified, the Audit Committee may appoint
different independent auditors at any time if it determines that
such a change would be in the Companys stockholders
best interest.
Representatives of BDO are not expected to be present at the
Annual Meeting.
The Audit Committee and the Board of Directors unanimously
recommend the stockholders vote FOR the ratification
of BDO to act as independent auditors for the fiscal year ending
June 30, 2007.
BDO served as the Companys independent accountants to
audit the Companys fiscal years ended June 30, 2006
and June 30, 2005.
Ernst & Young served as the Companys independent
accountants to audit the Companys fiscal year ended
June 30, 2004. Ernst & Young LLP served as the
Companys independent accountants to audit the
Companys fiscal year ended June 30, 2003.
Ernst & Young were dismissed as the Companys
independent auditors effective September 12, 2004 and were
replaced by BDO. The Audit Committee approved the dismissal of
Ernst & Young and the Board of Directors ratified the
Audit Committees dismissal of Ernst & Young. The
Audit Committee approved the appointment of BDO effective from
September 12, 2004. The appointment of BDO occurred
following a bid process which the Company regularly undertakes
to ensure it receives cost effective audit services.
Ernst &Youngs and Ernst & Young
LLPs respective reports on the Companys financial
statements for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2004 and
2003 did not contain an adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion
and were not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit
scope, or accounting principles.
During the Companys two most recent fiscal years prior to
the dismissal of Ernst & Young, there were no
disagreements, as that term is described in
Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of
Regulation S-K
of the SEC between the Company and Ernst &Young or
Ernst &Young LLP on any matter of accounting principles
or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope
or procedure, which disagreements, if not resolved to the
satisfaction of Ernst &Young or Ernst &Young
LLP, would have caused Ernst &Young or
Ernst &Young LLP to make reference to the subject
matter of the disagreement in connection with its report.
6
During the Companys two most recent fiscal years prior to
the dismissal of Ernst & Young, there were no
reportable events, as that term is described in
Item 304(a)(1)(v) of
Regulation S-K,
except for a material weakness in the Companys internal
control for the year ended June 30, 2004 which was
identified and disclosed in Item 9A in the
Registrants Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the years ended June 30, 2004, June 30, 2005 and
June 30, 2006. Specifically, the Company noted that the
personnel and management of Novogen who performed the
Companys accounting and financial reporting functions
pursuant to a services agreement were not sufficiently expert in
U.S. GAAP and the requirements of the SEC and the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board and that this lack of
expertise represented a material weakness in the operation of
the Companys internal control over financial reporting. It
was further noted that the Companys system of financial
reporting was not designed to prepare financial statements in
accordance with U.S. GAAP and that the Companys
system of internal control, in particular its processes to
review and analyze elements of the financial statement close
process and prepare consolidated financial statements in
accordance with U.S. GAAP, had not reduced to a relatively
low level the risk that errors in amounts that would be material
in relation to those financial statements might occur and might
not be detected within a timely period by management in the
normal course of business.
The Company now believes that Novogen has adopted processes that
are designed to ensure that the preparation of the
Companys consolidated financial statements, including the
process to review and analyze elements of the Companys
financial statement close process, is in accordance with
U.S. GAAP and that relevant information about
U.S. GAAP, SEC financial reporting requirements and the
requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board is
available to those persons involved in the process by which the
financial statements are prepared. As a result, the Company has
re-assessed the effectiveness of Novogens disclosure
controls and procedures as they relate to the Company and having
allowed a period of time to determine the effectiveness of
additional controls and procedures, it now believes that the
weakness in internal accounting control as described above has
been eliminated.
During the Companys two most recent fiscal years prior to
the dismissal of Ernst & Young, the Company did not
consult BDO on (i) either the application of accounting
principles to a specified transaction, either completed or
proposed, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on
the Companys financial statements, and neither a written
report nor oral advice was provided to the Company that BDO
concluded was an important factor considered by the Company in
reaching a decision as to the accounting, auditing or financial
reporting issue; or (ii) the subject of any disagreement or
reportable event.
PROPOSAL 3
APPROVAL OF ISSUANCE OF COMMON STOCK PURSUANT TO
STANDBY EQUITY DISTRIBUTION AGREEMENT
The Board of Directors is submitting for the stockholders
approval a proposal to approve the issuance of the
Companys Common Stock in an amount equal to 20% or more of
the shares of Common Stock outstanding pursuant to the Standby
Equity Distribution Agreement (the SEDA), the
Company entered into with Cornell Capital effective
July 11, 2006.
Under the terms of the SEDA, Cornell Capital has committed to
purchase up to $15,000,000 of the Companys Common Stock,
subject to certain restrictions. The Company entered into the
SEDA with Cornell Capital to provide a source of future capital
for ongoing research and development of the Companys
products in addition to general working capital.
The Companys Common Stock currently trades on the Nasdaq
Global Market. Nasdaq Market Place Rule 4350(i)(1)(D)(ii)
requires the Company to obtain stockholder approval for the
sale, issuance or potential issuance by the Company of Common
Stock (or securities convertible into Common Stock) equal to 20%
or more of the Common Stock or 20% or more of the voting power
outstanding before the issuance for a purchase price that is
less than the greater of the book or market value of the Common
Stock (the Nasdaq Share Limit). As described in
detail below, because the number of shares of Common Stock which
may be sold to Cornell Capital under the SEDA may equal or
exceed 20% of the Companys Common Stock outstanding before
such sale, the Board of Directors is
7
requesting the stockholders approval of such potential
issuances of Common Stock under the SEDA in accordance with
Nasdaq Market Place Rule 4350 (i)(1)(D)(ii).
The issuance of the Companys Common Stock to Cornell
Capital under the SEDA in excess of the Nasdaq Share Limit will
require approval by the majority of the votes cast by the
holders of the shares of Common Stock voting in person or by
proxy at the Annual Meeting. Stockholders may vote either for or
against or abstain from voting on the proposal to approve the
issuance of the Companys Common Stock to Cornell Capital
under the SEDA in excess of the Nasdaq Share Limit. Abstentions
and broker non-votes, if any, will be counted for the purposes
of determining the presence or absence of a quorum, but will
have no effect on the approval of the issuance of the
Companys Common Stock to Cornell Capital under the SEDA in
excess of the Nasdaq Share Limit.
The Board of Directors unanimously recommends the
stockholders vote FOR the approval of the issuance
of Common Stock to Cornell Capital under the SEDA in excess of
the Nasdaq Share Limit.
Standby
Equity Distribution Agreement
This summary does not purport to be complete and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to the full text of the SEDA and the
related Registration Rights Agreement between the Company and
Cornell Capital dated July 11, 2006. Copies of such
documents have been filed with the SEC as exhibits 10.1 and
10.2 to the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
dated July 12, 2006.
On July 11, 2006, the Company entered into the SEDA with
Cornell Capital pursuant to which the Company may issue and
sell, from time to time, up to $15,000,000 of the Companys
Common Stock to Cornell Capital. The SEDA requires that the
Company have an effective registration statement filed with the
SEC registering the Common Stock issuable to Cornell Capital
under the SEDA for resale before the Company makes its first
sale of Common Stock to Cornell Capital under the SEDA.
Commencing as of the effective date of the registration
statement and continuing for up to 24 months thereafter,
the Company may, from time to time, at the Companys sole
and exclusive option, and subject to certain restrictions set
forth in the SEDA, sell shares of the Companys Common
Stock to Cornell Capital at a purchase price equal to 97% of the
lowest volume weighted average price of the Companys
Common Stock as quoted by Bloomberg, LP (subject to a
minimum acceptable price as described below) during
the five consecutive trading days after the Company sends
advance notice to Cornell Capital of the Companys
intention to sell it shares of the Companys Common Stock,
or the pricing period. Such sales may be made every five days up
to a maximum of $1,500,000 per sale.
The minimum acceptable price at which the Company may sell
shares of the Companys Common Stock, unless the Company
waives (in its sole discretion) the minimum acceptable price, is
no less than 97% of the lowest volume weighted average price for
the Companys shares of Common Stock on the trading day
immediately preceding the date the Company gives advance notice
to Cornell Capital of the Companys intention to sell. For
any day in the pricing period when the lowest volume weighted
average price is less than the minimum acceptable price,
(i) that days lowest volume weighted average price
will be excluded from the pricing mechanism during the pricing
period; (ii) the Company will automatically reduce the
amount of the purchase price to be paid by Cornell Capital by
20%; and (iii) the number shares of the Companys
Common Stock to be sold to Cornell Capital will be reduced
proportionately.
The Companys ability to sell shares of Common Stock to
Cornell Capital and Cornell Capitals obligation to
purchase the shares, is conditioned upon the satisfaction of
certain conditions. These conditions include, among others:
(i) the initial and continued effectiveness of the
registration statement covering the resale of the shares of
Common Stock issued to Cornell Capital under the SEDA;
(ii) that no fundamental changes to the information set
forth in the registration statement exist that require the
Company to file a post-effective amendment to the registration
statement; (iii) that the Company has performed and
complied with its obligations under the SEDA and Registration
Rights Agreement as of the date of each sale; (iv) that the
Companys Common Stock has not been suspended from trading
by the SEC or the Nasdaq Global Market nor delisted from the
Nasdaq Global Market; and (v) that the number of shares of
Common Stock issuable to Cornell Capital, together with any
shares then beneficially owned by Cornell Capital and its
affiliates, does not exceed 9.9% of the Companys
outstanding Common Stock as of the date each sale.
8
In connection with the SEDA, on July 11, 2006, the Company
issued to Cornell Capital as a commitment fee
123,626 shares of Common Stock and warrants to purchase
600,000 shares of Common Stock of the Company in a private
placement. The warrants have an exercise price of $4.35 per
share, subject to certain adjustments, and expire on
July 11, 2010.
Use of
Proceeds
The Company may sell up to $15,000,000 of Common Stock to
Cornell under the SEDA, minus certain deductions and commissions
associated with such sales. The Company intends to use the net
proceeds from sales under the SEDA to provide a source of future
capital for ongoing research and development of the
Companys products and general working capital.
Effect on
Outstanding Common Stock
The issuance of Common Stock under SEDA will have no effect on
the rights or privileges of existing holders of Common Stock
with the exception that the economic and voting interests of
each stockholder will be diluted as a result of such issuance.
The issuance of Common Stock to Cornell Capital under the SEDA
may result in a decrease in the market price of the Common
Stock. Because Cornell Capital will purchase shares of Common
Stock through the SEDA at a discount to market price, Cornell
Capital will have an incentive to immediately sell the shares of
Common Stock that it purchases in order to realize a gain on the
difference between the purchase price and the then-prevailing
market price of the Common Stock. These sales may result in a
decrease in the market price of the Common Stock.
Cornell is deemed to beneficially own the shares corresponding
to a particular notice on the date that the Company delivers
such notice to Cornell Capital of its intention to sell shares
of Common Stock to Cornell under the SEDA. The delivery of such
notice to Cornell Capital is prior to the date the shares of
Common Stock are delivered to Cornell Capital. Cornell Capital
may sell such shares any time after the Company delivers notice,
and its sales during the pricing period could cause the market
price of the Common Stock to decline. Even with the SEDAs
price floor (the minimum acceptable price of 97% of the lowest
volume weighted average price of the Common Stock as quoted by
Bloomberg LP during the pricing period), Cornell Capitals
sales could adversely impact share price by as much as three
percent or more if the Company waives the minimum acceptable
price. In addition, stockholders may experience dilution if the
Company sells shares of Common Stock to Cornell Capital under
the SEDA at a price which is less than the Companys net
tangible book value per share of Common Stock.
Consequences
if Stockholder Approval is not Obtained
If the stockholder approval sought hereby is not obtained, the
Company will not issue any shares of Common Stock to Cornell
Capital under the SEDA. In the event that the Company needs
additional capital, it will have to seek alternative forms of
financing which may be less favorable or unavailable.
COMPENSATION
AND OTHER INFORMATION CONCERNING OFFICERS, DIRECTORS
AND CERTAIN STOCKHOLDERS
Executive
Officers
The Companys executive officers are appointed by the Board
of Directors and serve at the discretion of the Board of
Directors. Set forth below are the names and certain
biographical information regarding the Companys executive
officers as of October 23, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position Held
|
|
Professor Graham E. Kelly
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
Chairman
|
Christopher Naughton
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive
Officer
|
David R. Seaton
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer and
Secretary
|
See Proposal No. 1 Election of
Directors for biographical information regarding Professor
Kelly and Mr. Naughton.
9
David
Ross Seaton
B
Bus KCAE, M Com UNSW, CPA
Mr. Seaton has been the Companys Chief Financial
Officer and Secretary since December 2000 and has been Chief
Financial Officer of Novogen since September 1999.
Mr. Seaton has been a director of Glycotex since September
2005. He holds a degree in Business Studies as well as a Master
of Commerce Degree from the University of New South Wales. He
has completed management development programs at Northwestern
University in Chicago as well as Duke University and the London
Business School. He has 20 years experience in the
pharmaceutical industry. Prior to joining Novogen in 1999, he
was Finance Director of GlaxoWellcome Australia Limited from
1995 to 1999.
Director
and Executive Remuneration
Directors
Effective October 1, 2006, directors, who are not officers
of the Company, will receive directors fees of
A$45,000 per annum (approximately $33,404 based upon an
exchange rate of US$0.7423//A$1.00 at June 30, 2006). In
addition, effective October 1, 2006, the chairman of the
Audit Committee will receive an additional A$10,000 per
annum (approximately $7,423 based upon an exchange rate of
US$0.7423//A$1.00 at June 30, 2006) for his additional
responsibilities.
Prior to October 1, 2006, directors, who were not officers
of the Company received directors fees of
$A30,000 per annum (approximately US$22,269 based upon an
exchange rate of US$0.7423/A$1.00 at June 30, 2006).
Professor Kelly and Mr. Naughton do not receive any
remuneration for performing their duties as directors.
Executive
Officers
The executive officers, Professor Kelly, Mr. Naughton and
Mr. Seaton, are also executive officers of Novogen and do
not receive any remuneration directly from the Company in
performing their duties as executive officers of the Company. At
the present time, their services are provided pursuant to the
Companys services agreement with Novogen which is
described in this Proxy Statement under the section heading
Certain Transactions of this Proxy Statement.
Equity
Compensation Plan Information
The following table sets forth, as of June 30, 2006
outstanding awards and shares remaining available for future
issuance under the Companys compensation plans under which
equity securities are authorized for issuance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
(b)
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Securities to be
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Issued Upon
|
|
Exercise Price of
|
|
Available
|
|
|
Exercise of
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
for Future Issuance
|
|
|
Outstanding Options
|
|
Options,
|
|
Under Equity
|
Plan Category
|
|
Warrants and Rights
|
|
Warrants and Rights
|
|
Compensation Plans
|
|
Equity compensation plans approved
by security holders
|
|
Not Applicable
|
|
Not Applicable
|
|
Not Applicable
|
Equity compensation plans not
approved by security holders(1)
|
|
None
|
|
Not Applicable
|
|
Indeterminable
|
Total
|
|
None
|
|
Not Applicable
|
|
Indeterminable
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The Companys employee share option plan provides its
directors, employees, employees of the Companys affiliates
and certain of its contractors and consultants with the
opportunity to participate in the Companys ownership. To
date, no options have been issued under the plan. The
Companys remuneration committee addresses participation,
the number of options offered and any conditions of exercise. In
making these determinations the committee will generally
consider the participants position and record of service
to the |
10
|
|
|
|
|
Company and the Companys affiliates and potential
contribution to the growth of the Company and the Companys
affiliates. Any other matters tending to indicate the
participants merit may also be considered. Options will be
exercisable between two years and five years after grant, unless
otherwise determined by the committee appointed by the board.
Options granted will be exercisable at a price determined by the
committee at the time of issue (and will be subject to
adjustment in accordance with the terms of the plan). Other key
terms of the plan include: |
|
|
|
|
|
Options will lapse if the participants cease to be engaged by
the Company or its affiliates. The committee will have the
discretion to waive this provision.
|
|
|
|
The terms of the plan also provide for adjustments to the rights
of an option holder as a result of a reorganization of the
Companys capital or other corporate event. The holder of
an option is not permitted to participate in any distribution by
the Company or in any rights or other entitlements issued by the
Company to stockholders in respect of the Companys shares
unless the options are exercised prior to the relevant
record; and
|
|
|
|
All options vest on the occurrence of certain events such as a
change of control, as defined in the share option plan
|
The plan also contains standard provisions dealing with matters
such as administration of the plan, amendment of the plan and
termination or suspension of the plan.
11
STOCK
PERFORMANCE GRAPH
The graph set forth below compares the change in the
Companys cumulative total stockholder return on its Common
Stock between December 18, 2003 (the date the Common Stock
commenced public trading) and June 30, 2006 with the
cumulative total return of the NASDAQ Composite Index and the
NASDAQ Biotechnology Index during the same period. This graph
assumes the investment of $100 on December 18, 2003 in the
Companys Common Stock and each of the comparison groups
and assumes reinvestment of dividends, if any. The Company has
not paid any dividends on the Common Stock, and no dividends are
included in the report of the Companys performance. This
graph is not soliciting material, is not deemed
filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference in
any filing of the Company under the Securities Act or the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange
Act), whether made before or after the date hereof and
irrespective of any general incorporation language in any such
filing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/18/03
|
|
|
6/30/04
|
|
|
6/30/05
|
|
|
6/30/06
|
Marshall Edwards, Inc. Common Stock
|
|
|
$
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
$
|
99.07
|
|
|
|
$
|
95.07
|
|
|
|
$
|
45.20
|
|
NASDAQ Composite Index
|
|
|
$
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
$
|
104.68
|
|
|
|
$
|
105.15
|
|
|
|
$
|
111.04
|
|
NASDAQ Biotechnology Index
|
|
|
$
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
$
|
107.78
|
|
|
|
$
|
98.00
|
|
|
|
$
|
105.44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
None of the Companys directors or executive officers owns
any shares of the Companys Common Stock. The following
table sets forth information with respect to the beneficial
ownership, as of October 23, 2006 of shares of Common Stock
of the Company by each person known to beneficially own more
than 5% of the Companys Common Stock as of the record date.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name & Address of
|
|
Amount & Nature of
|
|
|
Percentage of Shares
|
|
Beneficial Owners
|
|
Beneficial Ownership
|
|
|
Beneficially Owned(3)
|
|
|
Novogen Limited
|
|
|
49,500,000
|
(1)
|
|
|
78.1
|
%
|
140 Wicks Road
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North Ryde
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New South Wales 2113
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OppenheimerFunds, Inc.
|
|
|
5,226,128
|
(2)
|
|
|
8.2
|
%
|
6803 S Tucson Way
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Centennial, CO 80112
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Novogen Limited is the beneficial owner of, and has sole voting
and investment power with respect to, the shares of Common Stock. |
|
(2) |
|
OppenheimerFunds, Inc is the beneficial holder of, and has sole
voting and investment power with respect to, the shares of
Common Stock. The shares of Common Stock are held by six
separate funds (the Funds) as follows: Oppenheimer
International Growth Fund/VA holds 465,600 shares of Common
Stock in the street name of its custodian, Kane & Co;
Oppenheimer International Growth Fund holds
2,732,701 shares of Common Stock in the street name of its
custodian, Kane & Co; Mass Mutual International Equity
Fund holds 1,711,880 shares of Common Stock in the street
name of its custodian, Hare & Co; AZL Oppenheimer
International Growth Fund holds 231,700 shares of Common
Stock in the street name of its custodian, Ell & Co;
OTC International Growth Fund holds 51,257 shares of Common
Stock in the street name of its custodian Gerlach & Co;
and OFI International Equity Fund holds 32,990 shares of
Common Stock in the street name of its custodian
Gerlach & Co. OppenheimerFunds, Inc. is the investment
advisor for each of the Funds. |
|
(3) |
|
Based upon 63,390,937 shares of the Companys Common
Stock outstanding as of October 23, 2006. |
CERTAIN
TRANSACTIONS
The Companys agreements with Novogen are each summarized
below. Each of these agreements was approved by a majority of
the Companys independent directors who did not have an
interest in the transaction. The Company believes that each of
the Companys agreements with Novogen is on terms as
favorable to the Company as the Company could have obtained from
unaffiliated third parties. The following description is only a
summary of what the Company believes are the material provisions
of the agreements.
The
License Agreement for Phenoxodiol
Novogens subsidiary, Novogen Research Pty Limited, has
granted the Companys subsidiary, Marshall Edwards Pty
Limited, a world-wide, non-transferable license under its
patents and patent applications and in its licensed know-how to
conduct clinical trials and commercialize and distribute
phenoxodiol products. The Company and Novogen have each
guaranteed the obligations of the Companys respective
subsidiaries under this license agreement. See Guarantee
and Indemnity Agreement. The license is exclusive until
the expiration or lapsing of the last relevant Novogen patents
or patent applications in the world, which the Company expects
will be no earlier than August 29, 2017, and thereafter is
non-exclusive for the remainder of the term of the agreement.
The license grants the Company the right to make, have made,
market, distribute, sell, hire or otherwise dispose of
phenoxodiol products in the field (the Field) of
prevention treatment or cure of cancer in humans by
pharmaceuticals delivered in all forms except topical
applications. The Company is obliged to continue current and
undertake further clinical trials of phenoxodiol, and is
responsible for paying for all materials necessary to conduct
clinical trials. The Company must conduct all such trials
diligently and professionally, must use reasonable endeavors to
design and conduct clinical trials to generate outcomes which
are calculated to result in regulatory approval of phenoxodiol
13
products. The Company must also keep proper records of all
clinical trials and allow Novogen to inspect those records.
All intellectual property rights in the compound, trial
protocols, results of the clinical trials, case report forms and
any other materials used in the conduct of the clinical trials
are assigned by the Company to Novogen and the Company may not
publish the results of clinical trials without the prior written
consent of Novogen. Each party must disclose to the other party
developments, improvements, enhancements or new know-how in
relation to the phenoxodiol product which are made or acquired
by either party.
The Company may not sub-license, sub-contract, or engage agents
without the prior written consent of Novogen. Any proposed
sub-contractors and agents must first agree in writing to comply
with certain confidentiality obligations and to assign to
Novogen all intellectual property rights in the Field created or
acquired by them in the course of their engagement.
Marketing
and Commercialization
The Company may market and commercialize phenoxodiol products
under the license in any manner the Company thinks fit, so long
as the Company conducts any marketing and commercialization
activities on a commercially reasonable basis in compliance with
applicable laws and regulations, comply with reasonable
directions given by Novogen, act in a manner which the Company
considers to be most beneficial to the interests of the Company
and Novogen, and otherwise act in good faith to Novogen. All
advertising and promotional material must be submitted to
Novogen for prior approval.
Fees,
Charges and Costs
Marshall Edwards Pty Limited paid $5,000,000 to Novogen in
February 2004 which was the first lump sum license fee payment
due under the terms of the license agreement. Also, Marshall
Edwards Pty Limited paid $2,000,000 to Novogen in January 2005
and $4,000,000 in January 2006 which were the annual milestone
license fee payments due under terms of the license agreement.
The Company paid a second lump sum licence fee of $5,000,000 to
Novogen in July 2006 following the raising of funds in a private
placement closed on July 11, 2006. This licence fee was due
on the later of November 1, 2003 or such later date when
the cumulative total of all funds received from debt or equity
issuances and revenue received from commercialization (income
other than sales) and sales of phenoxodiol products exceeds
$50,000,000. Following the private placement, the funds received
by the Company from equity issuances exceeded $50,000,000 which
triggered this licence fee payment. Future amounts payable to
Novogen under terms of the licence agreement are as follows:
1. Until the expiration of the exclusivity period of the
license, Marshall Edwards Pty Limited must pay Novogen 2.5% of
all net sales and 25% of commercialization income. After the
exclusivity period of the license, 1.5% of net sales must be
paid to Novogen.
2. In addition to the amounts listed above, upon the
receipt by Marshall Edwards Pty Limited of the first of:
(a) approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration
(FDA) of a New Drug Application (NDA)
for phenoxodiol;
(b) approval or authorization of any kind to market
phenoxodiol in the United States; or
(c) approval or authorization of any kind by a government
agency in any other country to market phenoxodiol.
Marshall Edwards Pty Limited must pay Novogen $8,000,000,
together with interest on that amount from (and including)
December 31, 2006, calculated at the bank bill rate. This
milestone license fee replaces the
$8,000,000 December 31, 2006 milestone license
fee which was deferred as per the amendment deed to the license
agreement agreed between the Company and Novogen in June 2006.
14
In addition to the amounts above, beginning in 2007, an
$8,000,000 annual milestone license fee is payable under the
amended terms of the license agreement for each calendar year
ending December 31 during the exclusivity period of the
license agreement.
The exclusivity period of the license ends on the later of:
(a) the date of expiration or lapsing of the last patent
right in the patents and patent applications set out in the
license agreement with Novogen; or
(b) the date of expiration or lapsing of the last licensed
patent right in which Marshall Edwards Pty Limited would, but
for the license granted in the license agreement, infringe in
any country in the territory covered by the license agreement by
doing in that country any of the things set out in the license
agreement.
For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2006, the Company has
included $2,000,000 as a license fee expense under this license
agreement in the Companys consolidated statements of
operations. This expense related to the December 31,
2005 milestone license fee.
Termination
The Company may terminate the license agreement at any time, by
giving three months notice to Novogen. The Company may
also terminate the agreement if Novogen commits a breach of any
of its material obligations under the agreement, becomes the
subject of certain bankruptcy proceedings or is unable to
lawfully perform its obligations. Novogen may terminate the
agreement if the Company commits a breach of any of the
Companys material obligations under the agreement, becomes
the subject of certain bankruptcy proceedings or is unable to
lawfully perform its obligations. Novogen may also terminate the
agreement immediately if a change of control, as defined in the
license agreement, occurs without the consent of Novogen.
The
License Agreement for NV-196 and NV-143
In May 2006, the Company entered into a second license agreement
with Novogen for two oncology compounds, NV-196 and NV-143.
Novogens subsidiary, Novogen Research Pty Limited, has
granted Marshall Edwards Pty Limited a world-wide,
non-transferable license under its patents and patent
applications and in its licensed know-how to conduct clinical
trials and commercialize and distribute NV-196 and NV-143
products. The license is exclusive until the expiration or
lapsing of the last relevant Novogen patents or patent
applications in the world, which the Company expects will be no
earlier than August 29, 2017, and thereafter is
non-exclusive for the remainder of the term of the license
agreement. The license grants the Company the right to make,
have made, market, distribute, sell, hire or otherwise dispose
of NV-196 and NV-143 products in the Field of prevention
treatment or cure of cancer in humans by pharmaceuticals
delivered in all forms except topical applications.
The Company is obligated to continue current and undertake
further clinical trials of NV-196 and NV-143, and is responsible
for paying for all materials necessary to conduct clinical
trials. The Company must conduct all such trials diligently and
professionally. The Company must use reasonable endeavors to
design and conduct clinical trials to generate outcomes which
are calculated to result in regulatory approval of NV-196 and
NV-143 products. The Company must also keep proper records of
all clinical trials and allow Novogen to inspect those records.
All intellectual property rights in the compounds, trial
protocols, results of clinical trials, case report forms and any
other materials used in the conduct of the clinical trials are
assigned by the Company to Novogen and the Company may not
publish the results of clinical trials without the prior written
consent of Novogen. Each party must disclose to the other party
developments, improvements, enhancements or new know-how in
relation to the NV-196 and NV-143 products which are made or
acquired by either party.
The Company may not sub-license, sub-contract or engage agents
without the prior written consent of Novogen. Any proposed
sub-contractors and agents must first agree in writing to comply
with certain confidentiality obligations and to assign to
Novogen all intellectual property rights in the Field created or
acquired by them in the course of their engagement.
15
Marketing
and Commercialization
The Company may market and commercialize NV-196 and NV-143
products under the license agreement in any manner that the
Company thinks fit so long as the Company conducts any marketing
and commercialization activities on a commercially reasonable
basis in compliance with applicable laws and regulations. The
Company must also comply with reasonable direction given to the
Company by Novogen, act in a manner which the Company considers
to be most beneficial to the interests of the Company and
Novogen and otherwise act in good faith to Novogen. All
advertising and promotional material must be submitted to
Novogen for prior approval.
Fees,
Charges and Costs
Marshall Edwards Pty Limited paid $1,000,000 to Novogen in May
2006 which was the first lump sum license fee payment due under
the terms of the license agreement. Future amounts payable to
Novogen under the terms of the license agreement are as follows:
1. Marshall Edwards Pty Limited must pay to Novogen the
following milestone license fees upon the occurrence of the
corresponding milestone as detailed below:
(a) the first licensed product containing NV-196 to reach a
milestone as described below; and
(b) the first licensed product containing NV-143 to reach a
milestone as described below.
The milestone license fees are:
(i) $1,000,000 on the date an investigational new drug
application for the licensed product goes into effect or the
equivalent approval of a government agency is obtained in
another country. If this event does not occur before
March 31, 2008, then this amount will be due on this date.
(ii) $2,000,000 on the date of enrollment of the first
clinical trial subject in a Phase II clinical trial of the
licensed product. If this event does not occur before
June 30, 2009, then this amount will be due on this date.
(iii) $3,000,000 on the date of enrollment of the first
clinical trial in a Phase III clinical trial of the
licensed product. If this event does not occur before
June 30, 2011, then this amount will be due on this date.
(iv) $8,000,000 on the date of the receipt of the first NDA
for the licensed product from the FDA or the equivalent approval
from a government agency in another country. If this event does
not occur before December 31, 2013, then this amount will
be due on this date.
2. Marshall Edwards Pty Limited must pay Novogen 5% of all
net sales and 25% of commercialization income for the term of
the license. The royalty rate is reduced by 50% if the licensed
patent right in any country or territory expires, lapses, is
revoked, does not exist or is assigned to Marshall Edwards Pty
Limited and the product is entirely manufactured and supplied in
such country.
3. Minimum royalties of $3,000,000 per year are
payable following the date of the first receipt of a new drug
application for a licensed product from the FDA (or equivalent
approval from a government agency in any other country) until
the expiration of the term.
For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2006, the Company has
included $1,000,000 as a license fee expense under this license
agreement in the Companys consolidated statement of
operations. This expense related to the initial milestone
license fee due upon execution of the agreement.
Termination
The Company may terminate the license agreement at any time by
giving three months notice to Novogen. The Company may
also terminate the agreement if Novogen commits a breach of any
of its material obligations under the agreement, becomes the
subject of certain bankruptcy proceedings or is unable to
lawfully perform its obligations. Novogen may terminate the
agreement if the Company commits a breach of any of the
Companys material obligations under the agreement, become
the subject of certain bankruptcy proceedings or is unable to
16
lawfully perform its obligations. Novogen may also terminate the
agreement immediately if a change of control, as defined in the
license agreement, occurs without the consent of Novogen.
The
Manufacturing License and Supply Agreement
The Companys subsidiary, Marshall Edwards Pty Limited has
granted to Novogens subsidiary, Novogen Laboratories Pty
Limited, an exclusive, non-transferable sub-license to
manufacture and supply phenoxodiol to the Company in its primary
manufactured form. The Company and Novogen have each guaranteed
the obligations of the Companys respective subsidiaries
under this manufacturing license and supply agreement. See
Guarantee and Indemnity Agreement. Novogen must not
sublicense its rights or engage agents or subcontractors to
exercise its rights or perform its obligations under the
agreement without the Companys prior written consent.
Supply
of Phenoxodiol
The Company provides to Novogen rolling forecasts quarterly of
the Companys estimated supply requirements for
phenoxodiol, and issues purchase orders for phenoxodiol to
Novogen specifying the volume of phenoxodiol required. Novogen
must confirm the quantity that it is able to supply to fulfill
the purchase order within five business days of receiving the
purchase order. Novogen must then supply the volume of
phenoxodiol it agreed to supply, and must otherwise use all
reasonable endeavors to fulfill the purchase order. Novogen must
manufacture and deliver phenoxodiol to the Company at a port
nominated by the Company. Title to the phenoxodiol does not pass
to the Company until the Company has paid the purchase price (as
described below) and retention of title arrangements apply. The
Company is not obligated to purchase any minimum amount of
phenoxodiol from Novogen.
The Company must also provide to Novogen at least one
years advance written notice of the date on which the
phenoxodiol product will be first offered for sale commercially.
If Novogen materially and persistently fails to supply the
amount of phenoxodiol ordered by the Company by the required
date, the Company may manufacture (or engage a third party,
without Novogens consent, to manufacture) the amount of
the shortfall of phenoxodiol until Novogen demonstrates that it
is able to consistently supply phenoxodiol in accordance with
the Companys requirements. In this case, Novogen must take
all reasonable steps to make available to the Company or the
third party, on commercial terms, the know-how necessary to
enable that manufacture to occur.
Fees
and Charges
The purchase price for phenoxodiol supplied is the total costs
to Novogen plus a
mark-up of
50%. The purchase price may be adjusted quarterly by Novogen by
reference to the actual costs referred to above for the
preceding quarter. If at any time the Company does not pay any
amount due to Novogen, Novogen may suspend the supply of
phenoxodiol to the Company until payment is received. Interest
accrues daily on the outstanding balance of all overdue amounts
payable to Novogen under the manufacturing license and supply
agreement.
For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2006, the Company
expensed $527,000 in fees under the manufacturing license and
supply agreement.
Manufacturing
Developments and Improvements
Each party must disclose to the other any new developments,
improvements and new know-how relating to the manufacture of
phenoxodiol which are made or acquired by it during the term of
the agreement. All intellectual property rights in developments,
improvements and new know-how made or acquired by Novogen are to
be assigned to the Company. The Company must provide to Novogen
such technical information and assistance as Novogen reasonably
requests in order to exercise its rights and perform its
obligations.
Each party acknowledges that nothing in the agreement shall have
the effect of transferring or assigning to Novogen any right,
title or interest in any intellectual property rights in the
phenoxodiol products licensed under the agreement.
17
Novogen agrees to notify the Company immediately on becoming
aware of any infringement of the intellectual property rights in
the licensed products or any claim by a third party that the
activities of the parties under the agreement infringe such
third partys intellectual property rights. If required,
Novogen agrees to be a party to any proceedings brought by the
Company in relation to any infringement of intellectual property
rights in the licensed products and also agrees, at the
Companys cost, to provide all reasonable assistance in
relation to such proceedings and to execute such documents as
the Company reasonably requires.
Novogen has taken the strategic decision not to manufacture
commercial scale Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (API) for
cancer drugs, including phenoxodiol, as these can be more
economically supplied by third parties with particular expertise
in this area. The contract facilities that have been identified
are FDA licensed, have a track record of large scale API
manufacture and have already invested in capital and equipment.
The Company has completed the novation to Marshall Edwards Pty
Limited of contracts that Novogen had entered into with third
parties to develop a scalable manufacturing method to ensure
that sufficient quantities of phenoxodiol can be manufactured in
compliance with cGMP (Current Good Manufacturing Practices) and
to complete the analytical and stability work necessary for an
NDA submission.
Termination
Either party may terminate the agreement immediately at any time
if the other party becomes the subject of certain bankruptcy
proceedings, becomes unable to carry out the transactions
contemplated by the agreement or breaches its obligations and
does not cure such breach within twenty-one days notice. The
Company may also terminate the agreement immediately if the
license agreement expires or is terminated. Novogen may also
terminate the agreement immediately if a change of control, as
defined in the manufacturing license and supply agreement,
occurs without the consent of Novogen.
Limitation
of Liability
The liability of Novogen for breach of conditions or warranties
imposed by statute is limited to the replacement of goods,
supply of equivalent goods, repair or replacement value of goods
or the re-supply or payment for re-supply of services.
The
License Option Deed
Novogens subsidiary, Novogen Research Pty Limited, has
granted the Companys subsidiary, Marshall Edwards Pty
Limited, an exclusive first right to accept and an exclusive
last right to match any proposed dealing by Novogen with its
intellectual property rights with a third party relating to
certain synthetic pharmaceutical compounds (other than
phenoxodiol) developed by Novogen or its affiliates.
Option
Compounds
The rights relate to all synthetic pharmaceutical compounds,
known as option compounds, delivered or taken in all forms
except topical applications (other than phenoxodiol, which is
the subject of the license agreement), developed before or
during the term of the deed, by or on behalf of Novogen or its
affiliates, which have known applications in the Field of
prevention, treatment or cure of cancer in humans.
Dealings
in Option Compounds and Exercise of Rights
Novogen must not, and must ensure that its affiliates other than
the Company do not, deal, solicit entertain or discuss dealings
with any intellectual property rights in the Field or in
relation to any option compounds without giving the Company an
exclusive first right to accept and an exclusive last right to
match any such dealing. If the Company exercises its first right
to accept or last right to match, Novogen must deal with the
intellectual property rights in favor of the Company on the
terms and conditions proposed. The Company has fifteen business
days to exercise those rights and, if the Company fails to do
so, Novogen may deal with those intellectual property rights in
favor of a third party provided that the terms are no more
favorable to that third party than those first offered to the
Company or which the Company declined to match.
18
Protection
of Intellectual Property
Novogen must act in good faith toward the Company in relation to
its obligations under the deed and must ensure that all persons
involved in any research or development work in the Field in
relation to option compounds assign all intellectual property
rights relating to the option compounds to Novogen. Novogen must
also ensure that its affiliates, other than the Company, do the
same. Novogen continues to be solely responsible for the
maintenance of any patent rights in the option compounds, which
it may maintain and enforce at its sole discretion and expense.
Development
Reports
Novogen must provide to the Company from time to time, and in no
event less frequently than every six months, development reports
relating to the clinical trials and development of option
compounds, and must notify the Company immediately of any
regulatory approvals granted and assessments made by any
government agency.
Term
and Termination
The term of the deed is sixteen years from the commencement date
of the agreement, unless terminated earlier. The Company may
terminate the deed at any time on three months notice to
Novogen. Either party may terminate the deed immediately at any
time if the other party becomes the subject of certain
bankruptcy proceedings, becomes unable to carry out the
transactions contemplated by the agreement or breaches its
obligations and does not cure such breach within twenty-one days
notice.
Novogen may also terminate the deed immediately if a change of
control, as defined in the license option deed, occurs without
the consent of Novogen.
The
Services Agreement
Novogen has agreed to provide a range of services to the
Company, or ensure that its subsidiaries provide those services.
These services include providing general assistance and advice
on research and development and commercializing phenoxodiol
products and other compounds in which the Company may acquire
intellectual property rights in the future, such as option
compounds in relation to which the Company has exercised its
rights under the license option deed.
Novogens obligations also include providing, within the
agreed budgets described below, the Companys needs with
respect to secretarial, marketing, finance, logistics,
administrative and managerial support. Novogen also plans,
conducts and supervises pre-clinical and clinical trials with
phenoxodiol and with other compounds in which the Company has
intellectual property rights. Novogen provides scientific and
technical advice on management of pre-clinical and clinical
research programs undertaken by the Company and manages such
research provisions. The Company has guaranteed the obligations
of the Companys subsidiary under the services agreement.
See Guarantee and Indemnity Agreement.
Novogen may not sub-contract the provision of any part of the
services without the Companys prior written consent.
Fees
for Services
The Company pays services fees to Novogen on a monthly basis in
accordance with an agreed annual budget. At the beginning of
each financial year Novogen prepares a budget estimate for the
Company with respect to the percentage of time spent by
Novogens employees and consultants in the provision of
services to the Company in the previous financial year and any
relevant considerations which are likely to influence the time
spent for the following financial year. Each estimate must
include the remuneration paid by Novogen to each person expected
to provide the services and the percentage of time Novogen
expects those persons will spend on the Companys business,
the allocated on-costs attributable to each person, a premises
rental charge and a charge for asset usage and general
overheads. The total estimate is to be the sum of these charges
plus a
mark-up of
10%. The Company also
19
pays Novogens reasonable out of pocket expenses incurred
in providing the services to the Company. At the end of the
fiscal year an adjustment is made to reflect actual costs
incurred where they differ from budget.
For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2006, the Company
expensed $1,294,000 in fees under the services agreement.
Intellectual
Property and Confidentiality
All intellectual property rights created by Novogen in the
performance of the services for or at the request of the Company
are licensed to the Company. Each party also has obligations to
the other party to honor the others confidential
information.
Termination
The Company may terminate its rights and obligations under the
services agreement on three months written notice to
Novogen. Either the Company or Novogen may terminate the
agreement immediately at any time if the other party becomes the
subject of certain bankruptcy proceedings, becomes unable to
carry out the transactions contemplated by the agreement,
breaches its obligations and does not cure such breach within
twenty-one days notice or if a change of control in the other
party occurs. Novogen may also terminate the agreement
immediately if a change of control, as defined in the services
agreement, occurs without the consent of Novogen.
Guarantee
and Indemnity Agreement
The Company has guaranteed the payment and performance of the
obligations of the Companys subsidiary, Marshall Edwards
Pty Limited, to Novogen and its subsidiaries, Novogen
Laboratories Pty Limited and Novogen Research Pty Limited, under
the license agreement, the manufacturing license and supply
agreement and the services agreement. Novogen has guaranteed the
performance of the obligations of Novogen Research Pty Limited
under the license agreement and the obligations of Novogen
Laboratories Pty Limited under the manufacturing license and
supply agreement to Marshall Edwards Pty Limited. Each of the
Companys and Novogens obligations in the guarantee
and indemnity agreement are absolute, unconditional and
irrevocable.
Indemnification
The Company and Novogen have each agreed to indemnity the other
if either of the Companys respective subsidiaries default
in the performance of any obligation under the license
agreement, the manufacturing license and supply agreement or the
services agreement. The defaulting party must indemnify the
other against all losses, liabilities and expenses, including
legal expenses on a full indemnity basis, incurred, directly or
indirectly, as a result of that default. The party in default
must pay the amount of those losses, liabilities and expenses on
demand to the non-defaulting party. Furthermore, if Marshall
Edwards Pty Limited defaults on its payment obligations, the
Company must pay that money as directed by Novogen.
Termination
This agreement is a continuing obligation, and remains in full
force until all the guaranteed obligations have been irrevocably
paid and performed in full.
AUDIT
COMMITTEE REPORT
The Audit committee of the Board of Directors has furnished
the following report on its activities during the fiscal year
ended June 30, 2006. The report is not deemed to be
soliciting material or filed with the
SEC or subject to the SECs proxy rules or to the
liabilities of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, and the
report shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into
any prior or subsequent filing under the Securities Act or the
Exchange Act except to the extent that the Company specifically
incorporates it by reference into any such filing.
The Audit Committee oversees the financial reporting process on
behalf of the Board of Directors. Management has the primary
responsibility for the financial reporting process, principles
and internal controls as well as
20
preparation of the Companys financial statements. The
audit committee is comprised of Mr. Stephen Breckenridge
(chairman), Mr. Philip Johnston, Professor Bryan Williams
and Professor Paul Nestel, each of whom is an independent
director as defined by the applicable Nasdaq and SEC rules. The
audit committee held four meetings during the fiscal year ended
June 30, 2006. Professor Williams was appointed as a member
of the Audit Committee effective March 31, 2006 to fill the
vacancy caused by the resignation of Professor David de Kretser
from the Audit Committee.
In fulfilling its responsibilities, the Audit Committee
appointed independent auditors BDO for the fiscal year ended
June 30, 2006. The Audit Committee reviewed and discussed
with the independent auditors the overall scope and specific
plans for their Audit. The Audit Committee also reviewed and
discussed with the independent auditors and with management the
Companys audited financial statements and the adequacy of
the Companys internal controls. The Audit Committee met
with the independent auditors, without management present, to
discuss the results of the Companys independent
auditors audits, their evaluations of the Companys
internal controls and the overall quality of the Companys
financial reporting. Although the Audit Committee has the sole
authority to appoint the independent auditors, the Audit
Committee will continue its practice of recommending that the
Board ask the stockholders, at their annual meeting, to ratify
their appointment of the independent auditors.
The Audit Committee monitored the independence and performance
of the independent auditors. The Audit committee discussed with
the independent auditors the matters required to be discussed by
Statements on Auditing Standards No 61 as amended by Statements
on Auditing Standards No 90 (Communication with Audit
Committees). The Companys independent auditors have
provided the Audit Committee with the written disclosures and
the letter required by Independence Standards Board Standard
No. 1, Independence Discussions with Audit
Committees, and the Audit Committee has discussed with the
independent auditor and management the independent
auditors independence.
Based upon the review and discussions referred to above, the
Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the
audited financial statements be included in the annual report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2006 for filing with the
SEC.
Mr. Stephen Breckenridge
Mr. Philip Johnston
Professor Bryan Williams
Professor Paul Nestel
INDEPENDENT
AUDITORS FEES
The following presents aggregate fees billed to the Company for
the fiscal years ended June 30, 2006 and June 30, 2005
by BDO, the Companys independent auditors and principle
outside accountants and Ernst & Young, the
Companys former independent auditors and principle outside
accountants.
Audit
Fees
Audit fees were $102,000 and $83,000 for the years ended
June 30, 2006 and June 30, 2005, respectively. The
fees were for professional services rendered for audits of the
Companys annual consolidated financial statements and for
reviews of the Companys quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q.
Audit
Related Fees
There were no audit related fees for the year ended
June 30, 2006 and June 30, 2005.
Tax
Fees
Tax fees were $2,550 and $8,850 for the years ended
June 30, 2006 and June 30, 2005, respectively. Tax
fees were incurred in connection with the preparation of tax
returns.
21
All
Other Fees
There were fees of $5,700 billed by BDO for the year ended
June 30, 2006 in connection with the Companys removal
of the previously reported material weakness. There were no
other fees billed by BDO for the year ended June 30, 2005.
PRE-APPROVAL
POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
The Audit Committee has adopted a policy and the procedure for
pre-approving all audit and non-audit services to be performed
by the Companys independent auditors. The policy requires
pre-approval of all services rendered by the Companys
independent auditors either as part of the Audit
Committees approval of the scope of the engagement of the
independent auditors or on a case by case basis.
The services provided for 2006 were 93% audit services, 0% audit
related fees, 2% tax fees and 5% all other fees. The services
provided above for 2005 were 90% audit services, 0% audit
related fees and 10% tax fees.
SECTION 16(A)
BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires the
Companys officers and directors and persons who
beneficially own more than 10% of the Common Stock of the
Company to file initial reports of ownership of such securities
and reports of changes in ownership of such securities with the
SEC. Such officers, directors and 10% stockholders of the
Company are also required by SEC regulations to furnish the
Company with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.
Based solely on the Companys review of the copies of the
forms furnished by such persons, the Company believes that, for
the fiscal year ended June 30, 2006, officers, directors
and 10% stockholders filed all required 16(a) forms on a timely
basis.
COMPENSATION
COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION
For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2006, the members of the
Remuneration Committee were Mr. Philip Johnston, Professor
Bryan Williams and Mr. Stephen Breckenridge. Professor
Williams was appointed as a member of the Remuneration Committee
effective March 31, 2006 to fill the vacancy caused by the
resignation of Professor David de Kretser from the Remuneration
Committee. All of the Remuneration Committee members during the
fiscal year ended June 30, 2006 were non-employee directors
and not former officers. No executive officer of the Company
served as a director or member of the remuneration committee of
another entity, one of whose executive officers served as a
director of the Company or member of the Remuneration Committee.
CODE OF
ETHICS
The Company has adopted a Code of Business and Ethics policy
that applies to the Companys directors and employees
(including the Companys principal executive officer and
the Companys principal financial officer), and has posted
the text of the Companys policy on its website at
www.marshalledwardsinc.com.
STOCKHOLDER
PROPOSALS FOR THE 2007 ANNUAL MEETING
To be considered for inclusion in next years proxy
statement, stockholder proposals must be received in writing,
addressed to the Companys Secretary and be received at the
Companys executive offices at 140 Wicks Road, North Ryde
Sydney NSW Australia 2113 no later than the close of business on
July 2, 2007.
DELIVERY
OF DOCUMENTS TO STOCKHOLDERS SHARING AN ADDRESS
Only one copy of the Companys most recent Annual Report on
Form 10-K
and this Proxy Statement is delivered to two or more
stockholders who share an address unless the Company or its
agent has received contrary
22
instructions from one or more of the stockholders. To request
that separate copies of these documents be delivered,
stockholders can contact the Companys registrar or
transfer agent by mail at: Computershare Investor Services LLC,
P.O. Box A3504, Chicago, Illinois
60690-3504;
or by telephone at:
(312) 360-5494.
You may also contact the Companys transfer agent if you
received multiple copes of the annual meeting materials and
would prefer to receive a single copy in the future.
GENERAL
Management does not intend to bring any business before the
meeting other than the matters referred to in the accompanying
notice. If, however, any other matters properly come before the
meeting, it is intended that the persons named in the
accompanying proxy will vote pursuant to the proxy in accordance
with their best judgment on such matters.
A copy of the Companys most recent Annual Report on
Form 10-K
is available on the Companys website at
www.marshalledwardsinc.com or can be made available
without charge upon written request to: Marshall Edwards, Inc.,
140 Wicks Road, North Ryde, New South Wales 2113, Australia,
Attention: Secretary.
OTHER
INFORMATION
The Company will pay all costs, estimated at $20,000, in the
aggregate, of soliciting proxies for the Annual Meeting.
Computershare Investor Services, LLC, the Companys
transfer agent, is assisting the Company in the mailing of the
proxies for an approximate fee of $16,000. In addition to
solicitation by mail, proxies may be solicited in person, by
telephone, telecopy or other means, or by directors, officers
and regular employees of the Company who will not receive
additional compensation for such solicitations. Proxy cards and
materials will also be distributed to beneficial owners of
Common Stock through brokers, custodians, nominees and other
like parties, and the Company expects to reimburse such parties
for their charges and expenses.
BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
/s/ David R. Seaton
David R. Seaton
Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
23
Marshall Edwards, Inc.
|
|
|
MR. A. SAMPLE |
|
|
DESIGNATION (IF ANY)
|
|
000000000.000 ext |
ADD 1
|
|
000000000.000 ext |
ADD 2
|
|
000000000.000 ext |
ADD 3
|
|
000000000.000 ext |
ADD 4
|
|
000000000.000 ext |
ADD 5
|
|
000000000.000 ext |
ADD 6
|
|
000000000.000 ext |
|
|
000000000.000 ext |
|
|
|
|
|
o Mark this box with an X if you have
made changes to your name or address details
above. |
Annual Meeting Proxy Card
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A.
|
|
Election of Directors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
|
The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the listed nominees. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For
|
|
Withhold |
01
|
|
Stephen Breckenridge
|
|
o
|
|
o |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
02
|
|
Professor Bryan Williams
|
|
o
|
|
o |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B.
|
|
Issues |
|
|
|
|
The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the following proposal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For
|
|
Against
|
|
Abstain |
1. Ratification of appointment of BDO as
auditors.
|
|
o
|
|
o
|
|
o |
The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the following proposal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Approval of issuance of Companys Common Stock to
Cornell Capital Partners, LP pursuant to the Standby
Equity Distribution Agreement entered into by the
Company and Cornell Capital Partners, LP on July 11,
2006.
|
|
For
o
|
|
Against
o
|
|
Abstain
o |
C. Authorized Signatures Sign Here This section must be completed for your instructions to be
executed.
NOTE: Please sign your name(s) EXACTLY as your name(s) appear(s) on this proxy. All joint holders
must sign. When signing as attorney, trustee, executor, administrator, guardian or corporate
officer, please provide your FULL title.
|
|
|
|
|
Signature 1 Please keep signature
within the box.
|
|
Signature 2 Please keep signature
within the box.
|
|
Date
(mm/dd/yyyy) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/ / |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proxy Marshall Edwards, Inc.
PROXY SOLICITED BY BOARD OF DIRECTORS FOR ANNUAL MEETING (DECEMBER 12, 2006)
Please sign, date and return promptly in the enclosed envelope.
The undersigned hereby appoints Christopher Naughton and David Seaton and each of them, as proxies,
with full power of substitution in each of them, for and on behalf of the undersigned to vote as
proxies, as directed and permitted herein to vote your shares of Marshall Edwards, Inc. Common
Stock at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Marshall Edwards, Inc. to be held on Tuesday,
December 12, 2006, at 1:00 pm (local time) at the offices of Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP, located at
1111 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, D.C. 20004, and at any adjournments thereof upon matters
set forth in the proxy statement, and, in their judgment and discretion, upon such other business
as may properly come before the meeting.
This proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in the manner directed on the reverse hereof by
the stockholder. IF NO DIRECTION IS MADE ON THIS MATTER, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED FOR THE NOMINEES
FOR DIRECTOR LISTED, FOR PROPOSAL 2 (RATIFICATION OF BDO AS AUDITORS) AND FOR PROPOSAL 3 (APPROVAL
OF ISSUANCE OF COMPANYS COMMON STOCK TO CORNELL CAPITAL PARTNERS, LP PURSUANT TO THE STANDBY
EQUITY DISTRIBUTION AGREEMENT ENTERED INTO BY THE COMPANY AND CORNELL CAPITAL PARTNERS, LP ON JULY
11, 2006).