def14a
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Filed by the
Registrant þ
Filed by a Party other than the
Registrant o
Check the appropriate box:
o Preliminary
Proxy Statement
o Confidential,
For Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by
Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
þ Definitive
Proxy Statement
o Definitive
Additional Materials
o Soliciting
Material Pursuant to
§ 240.14a-12
Marshall Edwards, Inc.
(Name of Registrant as Specified In
Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy
Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
o Fee
computed on table below per Exchange Act
Rules 14a-6(i)(4)
and 0-11.
|
|
(1) |
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
|
|
|
(2) |
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
|
|
|
(3) |
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed
pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on
which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was
determined):
|
|
|
(4) |
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
|
|
|
o
|
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
|
o
|
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by
Exchange Act
Rule 0-11(a)(2)
and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid
previously. Identify the previous filing by registration
statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its
filing.
|
|
|
(1) |
Amount Previously Paid
|
|
|
(2) |
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
|
Marshall
Edwards, Inc.
140 Wicks Road
North Ryde, New South Wales 2113
Australia
October 22, 2009
Dear Marshall Edwards Stockholder:
You are cordially invited to attend the 2009 Annual Meeting of
the Stockholders of Marshall Edwards, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the Company). The Annual Meeting will
be held on Tuesday, December 8, 2009, commencing at
1:00 p.m. (local time) at the offices of Morgan,
Lewis & Bockius LLP, located at 101 Park Avenue, New
York, New York 10178. We look forward to meeting with as many of
our stockholders as possible.
At the meeting, we will (i) elect one director,
(ii) act upon a proposal to ratify the appointment of our
independent auditor for the fiscal year ending June 30,
2010 and (iii) consider and act on such matters as may
properly come before the Annual Meeting and any adjournment
thereof.
There will also be a report on our business, and you will have
an opportunity to ask questions about the Company.
The Companys Annual Report for the fiscal year ended
June 30, 2009 is being mailed to you together with the
enclosed proxy materials.
It is important that your shares be represented at the Annual
Meeting. Whether or not you plan to attend in person, you are
invited to complete, sign, date and return the enclosed proxy in
the envelope provided.
Yours
sincerely,
Christopher Naughton
President and Chief Executive
Officer
Marshall
Edwards, Inc.
140 Wicks Road
North Ryde, New South Wales 2113
Australia
Notice of
Annual Meeting of Stockholders
To Be Held on Tuesday, December 8, 2009
October 22, 2009
To the Stockholders of Marshall Edwards, Inc.:
Notice is hereby given that the Annual Meeting of Stockholders
of Marshall Edwards, Inc., a Delaware corporation, has been
called and will be held on Tuesday, December 8, 2009, at
1:00 p.m. (local time) at the offices of Morgan,
Lewis & Bockius LLP, located at 101 Park Avenue, New
York, New York 10178, for the following purposes:
1. to elect one member to the Board of Directors;
2. to ratify the appointment of our independent auditor for
the fiscal year ending June 30, 2010; and
3. to consider and act on such matters as may properly come
before the Annual Meeting and any adjournment thereof.
Only stockholders of record at the close of business on
October 15, 2009, will be entitled to notice of and to vote
at the Annual Meeting and at any adjournment thereof.
ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
David R. Seaton
Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
WHETHER OR NOT YOU EXPECT TO ATTEND THE ANNUAL MEETING IN
PERSON, WE URGE YOU TO COMPLETE, SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THE
ENCLOSED PROXY CARD AT YOUR EARLIEST CONVENIENCE. YOU MAY RETURN
YOUR PROXY CARD IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE (NO POSTAGE IS REQUIRED
IF MAILED IN THE UNITED STATES).
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
i
MARSHALL
EDWARDS, INC.
140 Wicks Road
North Ryde, New South Wales 2113
Australia
PROXY
STATEMENT
This Proxy Statement is being furnished in connection with the
solicitation of proxies by and on behalf of the Board of
Directors of Marshall Edwards, Inc. (the Company) to
be used at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on
Tuesday, December 8, 2009 (the Annual Meeting),
and at any adjournment thereof, for the purposes set forth in
the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting. This Proxy Statement
and the accompanying materials are expected to be first sent or
given to stockholders of the Company on or about
October 22, 2009.
The close of business on October 15, 2009 has been fixed as
the record date (the Record Date) for the
determination of the stockholders entitled to notice of and to
vote at the Annual Meeting. Only holders of shares of the
Companys common stock, $0.00000002 par value per
share (the Common Stock) as of the Record Date are
entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting. Each
share of Common Stock entitles the holder thereof to one vote
per share on each matter presented to the stockholders for
approval at the Annual Meeting. On the Record Date, there were
73,463,233 shares of Common Stock outstanding and entitled
to vote.
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY
MATERIALS FOR THE ANNUAL STOCKHOLDERS MEETING TO BE HELD ON
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 8, 2009.
The Proxy Statement, the Companys Annual Report for the
fiscal year ended June 30, 2009 and the directions to the
Annual Meeting are available at
http://www.proxydocs.com/mshl.
If your shares are registered directly in your name with the
Companys transfer agent, Computershare Investor Services
LLC, you are considered the stockholder of record of
those shares and this Proxy Statement and the accompanying
materials are being sent directly to you by the Company.
If you are a stockholder of record (also called a registered
stockholder) you can vote your shares in person at the Annual
Meeting or you can vote by proxy by completing and returning the
enclosed proxy card. Whichever method you use, each valid proxy
received in time will be voted at the Annual Meeting in
accordance with your instructions. To ensure that your proxy is
voted, it should be received by the close of business on
December 7, 2009. If you submit a proxy without giving
instructions, your shares will be voted as recommended by the
Board of Directors.
If your shares are held in a stock brokerage account or by a
bank or other nominee, you are considered the beneficial
owner of shares held in street name (also called a
street name holder), and this Proxy Statement and
the accompanying materials are being forwarded to you by your
broker, bank or nominee, who is considered the stockholder of
record of those shares. As a beneficial owner, you have the
right to direct your broker, bank or nominee on how to vote the
shares held in your account.
If you are a beneficial owner of shares held in street name, you
are invited to attend the Annual Meeting. However, since you are
not a stockholder of record, you may not vote these shares in
person at the Annual Meeting unless you bring with you a legal
proxy from the stockholder of record. A legal proxy may be
obtained from your broker, bank or nominee. If you do not wish
to vote in person or you will not be attending the Annual
Meeting, you may vote your shares according to the voting
instructions that you receive from your broker, bank or nominee.
You may change your vote or revoke your proxy at any time before
it is voted at the Annual Meeting by executing a later-voted
proxy or by voting by ballot at the Annual Meeting. Attendance
at the Annual Meeting will not in and of itself constitute
revocation of a proxy.
The presence, in person or by proxy, of the holders of one-third
of the shares of the Common Stock issued and outstanding and
entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting will constitute a quorum.
Assuming a quorum is met, the nominee for director must receive
a plurality of the votes cast by holders of the shares of Common
Stock as of the Record Date voting in person or by proxy at the
Annual Meeting, to be elected as a director. The proposal to
ratify the appointment of BDO Kendalls Audit &
Assurance (NSW-VIC) Pty Ltd (BDO Kendalls A&A)
as the Companys independent auditor for the fiscal year
ended June 30, 2010 will require approval by the majority
of the votes cast by the holders of the shares of Common Stock
as of the Record Date voting in person or by proxy at the Annual
Meeting.
With regard to the election of the director, votes may be cast
in favor or withheld. Votes that are withheld and broker
non-votes, if any, will be counted for purposes of determining
the presence or absence of a quorum, but will have no effect on
the election of the director. You may vote either for or against
or abstain from voting on the proposal to ratify the selection
of BDO Kendalls A&A as the Companys independent
auditor. Abstentions and broker non-votes, if any, will be
counted for the purposes of determining the presence or absence
of a quorum, but will have no effect on the ratification of BDO
Kendalls A&A as the Companys independent auditor.
UNLESS SPECIFIED OTHERWISE, THE PROXIES WILL BE VOTED
(I) FOR THE ELECTION OF THE NOMINEE TO SERVE AS DIRECTOR OF
THE COMPANY UNTIL THE ANNUAL STOCKHOLDERS MEETING IN 2012 AND
UNTIL HIS SUCCESSOR IS DULY ELECTED AND QUALIFIED AND
(II) FOR THE RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF BDO
KENDALLS A&A AS THE COMPANYS INDEPENDENT AUDITOR. IN
THE DISCRETION OF THE PROXY HOLDERS, THE PROXIES WILL ALSO BE
VOTED FOR OR AGAINST SUCH OTHER MATTERS AS MAY PROPERLY COME
BEFORE THE ANNUAL MEETING. MANAGEMENT IS NOT AWARE OF ANY OTHER
MATTERS TO BE PRESENTED FOR ACTION AT THE ANNUAL MEETING.
2
PROPOSAL 1
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
The Companys Board of Directors has nominated Professor
Bryan Williams to serve as director for a term to expire at the
2012 annual meeting of stockholders and until his respective
successor has been elected and qualified.
The Companys restated certificate of incorporation and
amended and restated bylaws provide that the authorized number
of directors shall be determined by a resolution of the Board of
Directors, but shall be between two and nine. The number of
directors on the Board of Directors is currently fixed at five.
Also, under the Companys restated certificate of
incorporation and amended and restated bylaws, the
Companys Board of Directors is divided into three classes,
with the classes serving three-year staggered terms. Each class
contains one-third (or if that number is not a whole number, the
whole number nearest one-third) of the directors, with members
of each class holding office for a three-year term. Currently
there are two directors whose terms expire in 2011, two
directors whose terms expire in 2010 and one director whose term
expires at the Annual Meeting.
Professor Williams is a member of the class of directors whose
term expires at the Annual Meeting. Mr. Stephen
Breckenridge, who was also a member of the class of directors
whose term expires at the Annual Meeting, resigned as a member
of the Board of Directors effective December 15, 2008.
The presence, in person or by proxy, of the holders of one-third
of the shares of the Common Stock issued and outstanding and
entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting will constitute a quorum.
Assuming a quorum is met, the nominee for director must receive
a plurality of the votes cast by holders of the shares of Common
Stock as of the Record Date voting in person or by proxy at the
Annual Meeting to be elected as a director. Votes may be cast in
favor or withheld. Votes that are withheld and broker non-votes,
if any, will be counted for purposes of determining the presence
or absence of a quorum, but will have no effect on the election
of the director.
Nominee
The following table sets forth information, as of
October 15, 2009, regarding the nominee.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Positions Held
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
with Company
|
|
Professor Bryan Williams
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
Non-Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors
|
Business
Experience of Nominee
Professor Bryan Williams, age 60, Director
B.Sc. (Hons)(Microbiology) and PhD (Microbiology)
Professor Williams has been a director of the Company since
March 2006. Professor Williams has been the non-executive
Chairman of the Board of Directors since November 2006. Since
January 1, 2006, Professor Williams has been the director
of the Monash Institute of Medical Research in Melbourne,
Australia. From 1991 to 2005, Professor Williams was Chairman of
the Department of Cancer Biology, Lerner Research Institute, The
Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio. From 1993 to 2005,
Professor Williams was Professor, Department of Genetics at Case
Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio. From 1998 to 2005,
Professor Williams was an Associate Director of the Case
Comprehensive Cancer Center in Cleveland, Ohio. He is an
Honorary Fellow of the Royal Society of New Zealand. Professor
Williams term as a director of the Company expires at the
Annual Meeting.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE
FOR THE ELECTION OF PROFESSOR BRYAN WILLIAMS AS
DIRECTOR OF THE COMPANY.
3
Business
Experience of Members of the Board of Directors Continuing in
Office
Members
Whose Terms Expire at the 2010 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders
Mr. Philip Johnston, age 61, Director
Dip Eng (Production)
Mr. Johnston has been a director of the Company since April
2001. Mr. Johnston has more than 25 years of
experience in the pharmaceutical industry. He has been a
non-executive director of Novogen, Limited, the Companys
parent (Novogen), since 1997 and chairman of Novogen
since January 2001. Mr. Johnston was a non-executive
director of LIPA Pharmaceuticals Limited from June 2004 until
November 2007, at which time LIPA Pharmaceuticals Limited ceased
to be a public company. He is also the managing director of
Qualcare Management Pty. Ltd. Mr. Johnston has been a
director of Glycotex, Inc. (Glycotex), a subsidiary
of Novogen, since September 2005. From June 1988 to September
1997, Mr. Johnston was an executive director of Wellcome
Australia Limited. He was previously a director of two
subsidiary companies of GlaxoWellcome. Mr. Johnston has had
responsibility for production, distribution, quality assurance
and consumer product development and has been directly involved
in the establishment of strategic alliances and joint ventures.
Mr. Johnston has completed a number of executive
development programs including programs at the University of New
South Wales and the London Business School.
Professor Paul John Nestel, age 79, Director
AO, MD, FTSE, FRACP, FAHA, FCSANZ
Professor Nestel has been a director of the Company since April
2001. Professor Nestel has been a non-executive director of
Novogen since September 2001. He is currently on the Senior
Faculty at the Baker Heart Research and Diabetes Institute,
Melbourne. Professor Nestel is also a Consultant Physician at
the Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, a position which he has held
since 1977. He is Honorary Professor of Medicine at Deakin
University, Melbourne. He was formerly Clinical Professor in
Medicine, The Flinders University of South Australia. Professor
Nestel has been closely involved in national and international
pharmaceutical trials of cardiovascular drugs. He has been, and
remains, a member of many national and international committees
for research and policy on cardiovascular disease. He has
published over 420 scientific and medical papers and is a Fellow
of the Australian Academy of Technological Sciences and
Engineering, the Royal Australasian College of Physicians, a
Fellow of the American Heart Association and a Fellow of the
Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand. Professor Nestel
is an Officer of the Order of Australia and recipient of the
Centenary Medal.
Members
Whose Terms Expire at the 2011 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders
Mr. Christopher Naughton, age 56, Director
BEc, LLB
Mr. Naughton has been President, Chief Executive Officer
and director of the Company since the Companys inception
in December 2000. Mr. Naughton has been the Managing
Director of Novogen since March 1997. Mr. Naughton was
appointed Chairman of Glycotex in September 2005.
Mr. Naughton received degrees in Economics from the
Australian National University and in Law from the University of
New South Wales. He completed the Program for Management
Development at the Harvard Business School and is admitted to
practice as an attorney in New South Wales. After working in
merchant banking, he has spent over 20 years in the
pharmaceutical industry including appointments as a director of
Wellcome Australia Limited, and Glaxo-Wellcome in world-wide
business development in the United Kingdom.
Ms. Leah
Cann, age 49, Director
Ms. Cann has been a director of the Company and chairperson
of the Audit Committee since March, 2009 when she was appointed
by the Board of Directors to fill the vacancy caused by the
resignation of Mr. William D. Rueckert. Ms. Cann is
the President of Leah Rush Cann Research and Consulting, LLC, a
Newport, Rhode Island-based cancer and consulting organization
which she founded in 2003. She was a research scientist with
Memtec Corporation from 1984 to 1986. Ms. Cann was a
research analyst with CIBC Oppenheimer from 1992 to 1999. From
1999 to 2000, she was a health care analyst with Cadence
Capital, an asset manager based in Boston, Massachusetts.
Ms. Cann was a senior biotechnology analyst with Wachovia
Securities from 2000 to 2003. In both
4
1995 and 1996, The Wall Street Journal recognized Ms. Cann
as an All-Star analyst. Ms. Cann received a B.A. in art
history and chemistry and an M.B.A from Stetson University. She
was a post-baccalaureate at the College of William and Mary and
a post-graduate at Columbia University. Ms. Cann has been a
trustee and member of several committees of International House
in New York City for more than 10 years.
Resignation
of Directors
Mr. Stephen Breckenridge, whose term as a member of the
Board of Directors would otherwise have expired at the Annual
Meeting, resigned as a member of the Companys Board of
Directors effective December 15, 2008.
Mr. Breckenridge was chairperson of the Audit Committee and
a member of the Compensation Committee.
Mr. William D. Rueckert, whose term as a member of the
Board of Directors would have otherwise expired at the annual
meeting of stockholders in 2011, resigned as a member of the
Companys Board of Directors effective March 19, 2009.
Mr. Rueckert was chairperson of the Audit Committee.
Information
About the Board of Directors and its Committees
The Board of Directors has responsibility for the overall
corporate governance of the Company.
Three of the five members of the Board of Directors are also
currently directors of Novogen. The Company is a
controlled company within the meaning given to that
term by the Nasdaq Stock Market (Nasdaq) because
Novogen owns more than 50% of the Companys voting power.
As a controlled company, the Company is exempt from the
requirement that the Companys Board of Directors be
composed of a majority of independent directors, however, a
majority of the members of the Board of Directors are
independent in accordance with Nasdaq requirements.
The Board of Directors held a total of 12 meetings during the
fiscal year ended June 30, 2009. Each incumbent director
attended at least 75% of the total number of meetings of the
Board of Directors and the total number of meetings held by the
committees of the Board of Directors on which each incumbent
director served, in each case during the periods in which he
served. In addition to regularly scheduled meetings, the
directors discharge their responsibilities through telephone and
other communications with each other and with the executive
officers. As required under Nasdaq listing standards, the
independent directors meet in regularly scheduled executive
sessions at which only independent directors are present, in
conjunction with regularly scheduled meetings of the Board of
Directors. All of the directors are expected to attend the
Annual Meeting. All of the Companys directors attended the
annual stockholders meeting held in 2008 with the exception of
Professor Williams.
The Board has established an Audit Committee to oversee the
Companys financial matters and a Compensation Committee to
review the performance of executive directors and their
compensation.
Audit
Committee
The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors has been
established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange
Act). The Audit Committee is responsible for overseeing
financial and accounting activities. The Audit Committees
responsibilities include the annual appointment of independent
auditors and the review of the scope of audit and non-audit
assignments and related fees, the accounting principles used in
financial reporting, internal auditing and the Companys
internal control procedures. The members of the Audit Committee
are Ms. Leah Cann (chairperson), Mr. Philip Johnston,
Professor Bryan Williams and Professor Paul John Nestel, all of
whom are independent as defined by applicable Nasdaq and
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
rules. The Board of Directors has also determined that
Ms. Cann is an audit committee financial expert
as defined by SEC rules. The Companys has adopted an Audit
Committee Charter which is posted on the Companys website
at www.marshalledwardsin.com.
5
The Audit Committee held 5 meetings during the fiscal year ended
June 30, 2009.
Compensation
Committee
The Compensation Committee generally reviews the performance of
the executive directors and sets their compensation. The
Compensation Committee also has the power to make
recommendations to the full Board of Directors concerning the
allocation of stock options to directors and employees. The
compensation and terms of appointment of non-executive directors
are set by the Board of Directors. The Compensation Committee
does not have a charter. The members of the Compensation
Committee are Mr. Philip Johnston, Professor Bryan Williams
and Professor Paul John Nestel.
Because the Company has no employees and no compensation was
paid directly to the Chief Executive Officer or to any of the
other executive officers of the Company, there were no meetings
of the Compensation Committee held during the fiscal year ended
June 30, 2009.
Nominating
Committee
As a controlled company, the Company is not subject
to the Nasdaq rules requiring (i) Board of Director
nominations to be selected, or recommended for the Boards
selection, by either a nominating committee comprised solely of
independent directors or by a majority of the independent
directors on the Board of Directors and (ii) each
Nasdaq-listed company to have a formal written charter or
resolutions by the Board of Directors addressing the nominating
process. Accordingly, during the fiscal year ended June 30,
2009, the Company did not have a separately established
Nominating Committee. The Board of Directors does not believe
that any marked efficiencies or enhancements would be achieved
by the creation of a separate Nominating Committee.
The duties and responsibilities typically delegated to a
nominating committee are included in the responsibilities of the
entire Board of Directors. The Board of Directors identifies
nominees by first evaluating the current members of the Board of
Directors willing to continue in service. If any member of the
Board of Directors does not wish to continue in service or if
the Board of Directors decides not to re-nominate a member for
re-election, the Board will consider all qualified director
candidates identified by members of the Board, by senior
management and stockholders. Stockholders who would like to
propose an independent director candidate for consideration by
the Board of Directors may do so by submitting the
candidates name, resume and biographical information to
the attention of David R. Seaton, Secretary, Marshall Edwards,
Inc., 140 Wicks Road, North Ryde, New South Wales, 2113,
Australia, no later than the deadline for submission of
stockholder proposals set forth under the section of this Proxy
Statement entitled Stockholder Proposals for the 2010
Annual Meeting. All proposals for nomination received by
the Secretary of the Company will be presented to the Board of
Directors for consideration.
The Board of Directors reviews each director candidates
biographical information and assesses each candidates
independence, skills and expertise based on a variety of
factors, including the following criteria:
|
|
|
|
|
Whether the candidate has exhibited behavior that indicates he
or she is committed to the highest ethical standards.
|
|
|
|
Whether the candidate has had broad business, governmental,
non-profit or professional experience that indicates that the
candidate will be able to make a significant and immediate
contribution to the Board of Directors discussion and
decision-making.
|
|
|
|
Whether the candidate will be able to devote sufficient time and
energy to the performance of his or her duties as a director.
|
Application of these factors requires the exercise of judgment
by members of the Board of Directors and cannot be measured in a
quantitative way.
6
Director
Independence
The Companys Board of Directors has determined the
independence of each director and nominee for election as a
director in accordance with the elements of independence set
forth in the Nasdaq listing standards. Based upon information
solicited from each nominee, the Companys Board of
Directors has determined that each of Mr. Philip Johnston,
Professor Paul John Nestel, Professor Bryan Williams and
Ms. Leah Cann have no material relationship with the
Company and are independent within the meaning of
Nasdaqs director independence standards, Audit Committee
independence standards and Compensation Committee independence
standards, as currently in effect. Christopher Naughton, as
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, is not
considered independent in accordance with Nasdaqs
requirements.
Communications
with the Board of Directors
The Companys stockholders may communicate with the Board
of Directors, including non-executive directors or officers, by
sending written communications addressed to such person or
persons in care of Marshall Edwards, Inc., 140 Wicks Road, North
Ryde NSW 2113, Australia. All communications will be compiled by
the Secretary and submitted to the addressee. If the Board of
Directors modifies this process, the revised process will be
posted on the Companys website.
7
PROPOSAL 2
RATIFICATION OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
Background
The Audit Committee has selected BDO Kendalls Audit &
Assurance (NSW-VIC) Pty Ltd (BDO Kendalls A&A)
as independent auditor to audit the financial statements of the
Company for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2010. The Board
of Directors is submitting the appointment of BDO Kendalls
A&A to the stockholders for ratification as a matter of
good corporate practice.
BDO Kendalls A&A served as the Companys independent
auditor for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009.
BDO Kendalls NSW (BDO Kendalls) served as the
Companys independent auditor for the fiscal years ended
June 30, 2008 and June 30, 2007.
Effective as of October 10, 2008, the Audit Committee
engaged BDO Kendalls A&A as the independent auditors to
audit the Companys financial statements for the fiscal
year ended June 30, 2009. The Audit Committee approved the
appointment of BDO Kendalls A&A to replace BDO Kendalls who
resigned concurrent with the appointment of BDO Kendalls
A&A effective October 10, 2008.
Each of BDO Kendalls A&A and BDO Kendalls are Member Firms
of BDO International. The engagement of BDO Kendalls A&A
and the concurrent resignation of BDO Kendalls as the
Companys independent auditor resulted from the
reorganization of BDO Kendalls pursuant to which the audit
services previously provided by BDO Kendalls are now performed
by BDO Kendalls A&A. The reports of BDO Kendalls on the
Companys balance sheets as of June 30, 2008 and
June 30, 2007 and the related statements of operations,
stockholders equity and cash flows for each of the years
in the three year periods ended June 30, 2008 and
June 30, 2007, and for the period from December 1,
2000 (inception) through June 30, 2008, did not contain an
adverse opinion or a disclaimer of opinion, and were not
qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or
accounting principle.
During the fiscal years ended June 30, 2008 and
June 30, 2007 and the interim period from July 1, 2008
through October 10, 2008, there were no disagreements with
BDO Kendalls on any matter of accounting principles or
practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or
procedure, which, if not resolved to the satisfaction of BDO
Kendalls, would have caused BDO Kendalls to make reference to
the subject matter of the disagreement in connection with their
reports on the Companys balance sheets as of June 30,
2008 and June 30, 2007 and the related statements of
operations, stockholders equity and cash flows for each of
the years in the three year periods ended June 30, 2008 and
June 30, 2007, and for the period from December 1,
2000 (inception) through June 30, 2008.
During the fiscal years ended June 30, 2008 and
June 30, 2007 and the interim period from July 1, 2008
through October 10, 2008, there were no reportable events
as defined in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of
Regulation S-K.
The Company furnished a copy of the above disclosures to BDO
Kendalls and requested that BDO Kendalls furnish it with a
letter addressed to the SEC stating whether or not it agreed
with the above statements. A copy of such letter, dated
October 13, 2008, was filed as Exhibit 16.1 to the
Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
on October 14, 2008.
Prior to the engagement of BDO Kendalls A&A, neither the
Company nor anyone on behalf of the Company consulted with BDO
Kendalls A&A during the fiscal years ended June 30,
2008 and June 30, 2007 and the interim period from
July 1, 2008 through October 10, 2008, in any manner
regarding either: (a) the application of accounting
principles to a specified transaction, either completed or
proposed, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on
the Companys financial statements, and neither was a
written report provided to the Company nor was oral advice
provided that BDO Kendalls concluded was an important factor
considered by the Company in reaching a decision as to the
accounting, auditing or financial reporting issue, or (b) a
disagreement or a reportable event, as defined in
Item 304(a)(1)(iv) and (v), respectively, of
Regulation S-K.
Neither representatives of BDO Kendalls A&A nor BDO
Kendalls are expected to be present at the Annual Meeting.
8
Required
Vote
The ratification of the appointment of BDO Kendalls A&A as
the Companys independent auditor for the fiscal year ended
June 30, 2010 will require approval by the majority of the
votes cast by the holders of the shares of Common Stock as of
the Record Date voting in person or by proxy at the Annual
Meeting. Stockholders may vote either for or against or abstain
from voting on the proposal to ratify the selection of BDO
Kendalls A&A as the Companys independent auditor.
Abstentions and broker non-votes, if any, will be counted for
the purposes of determining the presence or absence of a quorum,
but will have no effect on the ratification of BDO Kendalls
A&A as the Companys independent auditor for the
fiscal year ended June 30, 2009. A failure to vote by not
returning a signed proxy will have no effect on the outcome of
the proposal.
In the event that the stockholders fail to ratify the
appointment, the Audit Committee will reconsider its selection
of audit firms, but may decide not to change its selection. Even
if the appointment is ratified, the Audit Committee may appoint
a different independent auditor at any time if it determines
that such a change would be in the Companys
stockholders best interest.
Recommendation
THE AUDIT COMMITTEE AND THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY
RECOMMEND THAT THE STOCKHOLDERS VOTE FOR THE
RATIFICATION OF BDO KENDALLS A&A TO ACT AS INDEPENDENT
AUDITOR FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 2010.
9
COMPENSATION
AND OTHER INFORMATION CONCERNING OFFICERS,
DIRECTORS AND CERTAIN STOCKHOLDERS
Compensation
Discussion and Analysis
At the present time, the services of Christopher Naughton, the
Companys President and Chief Executive Officer, and David
R. Seaton, the Companys Chief Financial Officer and
Secretary, are provided to the Company by Novogen pursuant to a
services agreement described in this Proxy Statement under the
heading Certain Relationships and Related
Transactions. The Company does not directly pay
Messrs. Naughton and Seaton for their services. The Company
has no other executive officers or employees. In the future,
should the services agreement with Novogen be terminated, or
should the Company hire executive officers whose services are
not covered by the services agreement, the Companys
Compensation Committee expects to align compensation paid to
executive officers on both a long and short term basis in the
form of cash salaries and the issuance of stock options under
the Marshall Edwards, Inc. 2008 Stock Omnibus Equity
Compensation Plan. Total compensation will be tied to individual
performance and supplemented with awards tied to the
Companys achieving certain financial and non-financial
objectives as pre-determined by the Companys Board of
Directors.
Executive
Officers
The Companys executive officers are appointed by the Board
of Directors and serve at the discretion of the Board of
Directors. Set forth below are the names and certain
biographical information regarding the Companys executive
officers as of October 15, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Positions Held
|
|
Christopher Naughton
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
David R. Seaton
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
|
|
See Proposal No. 1 Election of
Directors for biographical information regarding
Mr. Naughton.
David R. Seaton
B Bus, M Com, CPA
Mr. Seaton has been the Companys Chief Financial
Officer and Secretary since December 2000 and has been Chief
Financial Officer of Novogen since September 1999.
Mr. Seaton has been a director and Secretary of Glycotex
since September 2005 and the Chief Financial Officer of Glycotex
since October 2006. He holds a degree in Business Studies as
well as a Master of Commerce Degree from the University of New
South Wales. Mr. Seaton has completed management
development programs at Northwestern University in Chicago as
well as Duke University and the London Business School. He has
over 20 years experience in the pharmaceutical industry.
Prior to joining Novogen in 1999, Mr. Seaton was Finance
Director of GlaxoWellcome Australia Limited from 1995 to 1999.
Compensation
of Executive Officers
The Companys current executive officers, Christopher
Naughton and David R. Seaton, are also executive officers of
Novogen and do not receive any compensation directly from the
Company in performing their duties as executive officers of the
Company. As stated under the heading Compensation
Discussion and Analysis the services of Christopher
Naughton and David R. Seaton are provided to the Company
pursuant to the Companys services agreement with Novogen.
Grants of
Plan Based Awards
The Company did not grant any share options under the Marshall
Edwards, Inc. Share Option Plan during its term. The Marshall
Edwards, Inc. Share Option Plan terminated effective
December 9, 2008.
The Company adopted the Marshall Edwards, Inc. 2008 Stock
Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan effective December 9,
2008. During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009, the
Company did not issue any awards to its executives under the
Marshall Edwards, Inc. 2008 Stock Omnibus Equity Compensation
Plan.
10
Compensation
of Directors
The following table provides details of the fees paid to
directors of the Company for the fiscal year ending
June 30, 2009. Due to the impact of the global financial
crisis and the need for the Company to conserve cash, the
Companys directors voluntarily reduced directors
fees and other compensation by 20% effective February 10,
2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees Earned or Paid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
in Cash($)(1)
|
|
All Other Compensation($)
|
|
Total A($)
|
|
Total US($)(4)
|
|
Bryan Williams
|
|
A$
|
41,625
|
|
|
A$
|
13,875
|
(2)
|
|
A$
|
55,500
|
|
|
US $
|
44,705
|
|
Philip Johnston
|
|
A$
|
41,625
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A$
|
41,625
|
|
|
US $
|
33,528
|
|
Paul John Nestel
|
|
A$
|
41,625
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A$
|
41,625
|
|
|
US $
|
33,528
|
|
Stephen Breckenridge
|
|
A$
|
20,627
|
|
|
A$
|
4,583
|
(3)
|
|
A$
|
25,210
|
|
|
US $
|
20,307
|
|
William D. Rueckert
|
|
A$
|
32,625
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A$
|
32,625
|
|
|
US $
|
26,279
|
|
Leah Cann
|
|
A$
|
9,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A$
|
9,000
|
|
|
US $
|
7,250
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The Companys non-executive directors receive A$36,000 per
annum effective February 10, 2009, which represents a
reduction of A$9,000 per annum from A$45,000 per annum in
connection with their services. |
|
(2) |
|
Bryan William received A$13,875 in connection with his services
as non-executive Chairman of the Board of Directors. The annual
fee for services as non-executive Chairman of the Board of
Directors has been reduced from A$15,000 to A$12,000 effective
February 10, 2009 |
|
(3) |
|
Stephen Breckenridge received A$4,583 for his services as
chairperson of the Audit Committee from July 1, 2008
through December 15, 2008, at which time
Mr. Breckenridge resigned as a member of the Board of
Directors. Effective December 15, 2008, no amounts are paid
in connection with services as chairperson of the Audit
Committee. |
|
(4) |
|
Represents amount paid in US$ based upon an exchange rate of
US$0.8055 /A$1.00 as quoted by the Federal Reserve Bank of New
York at June 30, 2009. |
Christopher Naughton, President and Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, does not receive any compensation for performing
his duties as a director of the Company.
11
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth information with respect to the
beneficial ownership of shares of the Companys Common
Stock as of October 15, 2009 by (i) each person known
to beneficially own more than 5% of the Companys Common
Stock, (ii) each of the Companys officers and
directors and (iii) the Companys officers and
directors as a group.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount & Nature of
|
|
Percentage of Shares
|
Beneficial Owner
|
|
Beneficial Ownership
|
|
Beneficially Owned (4)**
|
|
Novogen(1)
|
|
|
52,408,295
|
|
|
|
71.3
|
%
|
OppenheimerFunds, Inc.(2)
|
|
|
8,671,776
|
|
|
|
11.8
|
%
|
Oppenheimer International Growth Fund(3)
|
|
|
4,965,704
|
|
|
|
6.8
|
%
|
Josiah T. Austin(4)
|
|
|
4,611,843
|
|
|
|
6.2
|
%
|
El Coronado Holdings, L.L.C.(5)
|
|
|
4,603,843
|
|
|
|
6.2
|
%
|
Christopher Naughton(6)
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Philip Johnston(7)
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Bryan Williams(8)
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Paul Nestel(9)
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
William D. Rueckert(10)
|
|
|
20,849
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Leah Cann
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
David R. Seaton(11)
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
All directors and executive officers as a group (7 individuals)
|
|
|
49,849
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Less than 1% |
|
** |
|
Based upon 73,463,233 shares of the Companys Common
Stock outstanding as of October 15, 2009. Shares of common
stock subject to warrants that are currently exercisable or
exercisable within 60 days of October 15, 2009 are
deemed outstanding in addition to 73,463,233 shares of
common stock outstanding as of October 15, 2009 for
purposes of computing the percentage ownership of the person
holding the warrants but are not deemed exercisable for
computing the percentage ownership of any other person. |
|
(1) |
|
Derived from a Schedule 13D filed on August 7, 2008 by
Novogen. Novogen is the beneficial owner of
52,408,295 shares of Common Stock. The business address of
Novogen is 140 Wicks Road, North Ryde, New South Wales
2113, Australia. |
|
(2) |
|
Derived from Amendment No. 3 to Schedule 13D filed by
Oppenheimer Funds, Inc. on January 27, 2009. Oppenheimer
Funds, Inc., an investment advisor, is the beneficial owner of
8,671,766 shares of Common Stock, which includes shares of
Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants exercisable
within 60 days of October 15, 2009. OppenheimerFunds,
Inc. exercises shared voting and investment control with respect
to the shares. The business address of Oppenheimer Funds, Inc.
is Two World Financial Center, 225 Liberty Street, New York, New
York 10281. |
|
(3) |
|
Derived from Amendment No. 3 to Schedule 13D filed by
Oppenheimer International Growth Fund on January 27, 2009.
Oppenheimer International Growth Fund is the beneficial owner of
4,965,704 shares of Common Stock, which includes shares of
Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants exercisable
within 60 days of October 15, 2009. Oppenheimer
International Growth Fund exercises shared voting and investment
control with respect to the shares. The business address of
Oppenheimer International Growth Fund is
6803 S. Tuscon Way, Centennial, Colorado 80122. |
|
(4) |
|
Derived from Schedule 13D filed by Josiah T. Austin on
November 13, 2007. Mr. Austin is the beneficial owner
of 4,611,843 shares of Common Stock, which includes
805,000 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the exercise
of warrants exercisable within 60 days of October 15,
2009. Mr. Austin shares voting and investment control with
respect to 4,603,843 of the shares. Mr. Austins
business address is 4673 Christopher Place, Dallas, Texas 75204. |
|
(5) |
|
Based upon information provided to us by El Coronado Holdings,
L.L.C. (El Coronado). El Coronado is the beneficial
owner of 4,603,843 shares of Common Stock, which includes
805,000 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the exercise
of warrants exercisable within 60 days of October 15,
2009. El Coronado shares |
12
|
|
|
|
|
voting and investment control with respect to the shares. Josiah
T. Austin is the sole managing member of El Coronado. The
business address of El Coronado is 4673 Christopher Place,
Dallas, Texas 75204. |
|
(6) |
|
Christopher Naughton is the beneficial owner of
5,000 shares of Common Stock which are held in the name of
The Naughton Family Superannuation Fund. Mr. Naughton
exercises shared voting and investment control with respect to
such shares. Mr. Naughtons business address is
c/o Marshall
Edwards, Inc., 140 Wicks Road, North Ryde, New South Wales 2113
Australia. |
|
(7) |
|
Philip A. Johnston is the beneficial owner of 10,000 shares
of Common Stock which are held in the name of Qualcare
Management Pty Ltd AFT The Johnston Superannuation Fund.
Mr. Johnston exercises shared voting and sole investment
control with respect to the shares. Mr. Johnstons
business address is 140 Wicks Road, North Ryde, New South Wales
2113 Australia. |
|
(8) |
|
Professor Bryan Williams is the beneficial owner of
5,000 shares of Common Stock. Professor Williams exercises
sole voting and investment control with respect to the shares.
Mr. Williams business address is
c/o Marshall
Edwards, Inc., 140 Wicks Road, North Ryde, New South Wales 2113,
Australia. |
|
(9) |
|
Professor Paul Nestel is the beneficial owner of
4,000 shares of Common Stock. Professor Nestel exercises
sole voting and investment control with respect to the shares.
Professor Nestels business address is
c/o Marshall
Edwards, Inc., 140 Wicks Road, North Ryde, New South Wales 2113,
Australia. |
|
(10) |
|
William D. Rueckert is the beneficial owner of
20,849 shares of Common Stock. Mr. Rueckert exercises
sole voting and investment control with respect to the shares.
Mr. Rueckerts business address is
c/o Marshall
Edwards, Inc., 140 Wicks Road, North Ryde, New South Wales 2113,
Australia. |
|
(11) |
|
David R. Seaton is the beneficial owner of 5,000 shares of
Common Stock. Mr. Seaton exercises sole voting and
investment control with respect to the shares.
Mr. Seatons business address is
c/o Marshall
Edwards, Inc., 140 Wicks Road, North Ryde, New South Wales 2113,
Australia. |
13
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
The Companys agreements with its parent corporation
Novogen are each summarized below. As Novogen is the
Companys parent corporation, each of the Companys
agreements with Novogen are considered related party
transactions. The Companys Code of Business and Ethics
provides that the Companys Audit Committee, which is
composed of independent directors in accordance with both Nasdaq
and SEC guidelines, review and approve all related party
transactions. As such, each of these agreements were reviewed
and approved by the majority of the members of the
Companys Audit Committee who did not have an interest in
the transactions. The Company believes that each of the
Companys agreements with Novogen is on terms as favorable
to the Company as the Company could have obtained from
unaffiliated third parties. The following description is only a
summary of what the Company believes are the material provisions
of the agreements.
The
License Agreement for Phenoxodiol, as amended
In September 2003, Novogens subsidiary, Novogen Research
Pty Limited (Novogen Research), entered into a
license agreement with the Companys subsidiary, Marshall
Edwards Pty Limited (MEPL), pursuant to which
Novogen Research granted MEPL a world-wide, non-transferable
license under its patents and patent applications and in its
licensed know-how to conduct clinical trials and commercialize
and distribute phenoxodiol products (the Phenoxodiol
License Agreement). The Company and Novogen have each
guaranteed the obligations of their respective subsidiaries
under the Phenoxodiol License Agreement. See Guarantee and
Indemnity Agreement. The Phenoxodiol License Agreement is
exclusive until the expiration or lapsing of the last relevant
Novogen patents or patent applications in the world, which the
Company expects will be no earlier than August 29, 2017,
and thereafter is non-exclusive for the remainder of the term of
the agreement. The Phenoxodiol License Agreement grants the
Company the right to make, have made, market, distribute, sell,
hire or otherwise dispose of phenoxodiol products in the field
of prevention, treatment or cure of cancer in humans by
pharmaceuticals delivered in all forms except topical
applications (the Field). The Company is obliged to
continue current and undertake further clinical trials of
phenoxodiol, and is responsible for paying for all materials
necessary to conduct clinical trials. The Company must conduct
all such trials diligently and professionally and must use
reasonable endeavors to design and conduct clinical trials to
generate outcomes which are calculated to result in regulatory
approval of phenoxodiol products. The Company must also keep
proper records of all clinical trials and allow Novogen to
inspect those records.
All intellectual property rights in the compound, trial
protocols, results of the clinical trials, case report forms and
any other materials used in the conduct of the clinical trials
are assigned by the Company to Novogen and the Company may not
publish the results of clinical trials without the prior written
consent of Novogen. Each party must disclose to the other party
developments, improvements, enhancements or new know-how in
relation to the phenoxodiol product which are made or acquired
by either party.
The Company may not
sub-license,
sub-contract,
or engage agents without the prior written consent of Novogen.
Any proposed
sub-contractors
and agents must first agree in writing to comply with certain
confidentiality obligations and to assign to Novogen all
intellectual property rights in the Field created or acquired by
them in the course of their engagement.
Marketing
and Commercialization
The Company may market and commercialize phenoxodiol products
under the Phenoxodiol License Agreement in any manner the
Company thinks fit, so long as the Company conducts any
marketing and commercialization activities on a commercially
reasonable basis in compliance with applicable laws and
regulations, complies with reasonable directions given by
Novogen, acts in a manner which the Company considers to be most
beneficial to the interests of the Company and Novogen, and
otherwise acts in good faith to Novogen. All advertising and
promotional material must be submitted to Novogen for prior
approval.
Fees,
Charges and Costs
MEPL paid $5,000,000 to Novogen in February 2004 which was the
first lump sum license fee payment due under the terms of the
Phenoxodiol License Agreement. Also, MEPL paid $2,000,000 to
Novogen in January 2005
14
and $4,000,000 in January 2006 which were the annual milestone
license fee payments due under the Phenoxodiol License
Agreement. MEPL paid a second lump sum license fee of $5,000,000
to Novogen in July 2006 following the raising of funds in a
private placement closed on July 11, 2006 (the
PIPE). This license fee was due on the later of
November 1, 2003 or such later date when the cumulative
total of all funds received from debt or equity issuances and
revenue received from commercialization (income other than
sales) and sales of phenoxodiol products exceeded $50,000,000.
Following the PIPE, the funds received from equity issuances
exceeded $50,000,000 which triggered this license fee payment.
Future amounts payable to Novogen under terms of the Phenoxodiol
License Agreement are as follows:
1. Until the expiration of the exclusivity period of the
license, MEPL must pay Novogen 2.5% of all net sales and 25% of
commercialization income. After the exclusivity period of the
license, 1.5% of net sales must be paid to Novogen. The
preconditions to such payments have not yet occurred.
The Exclusivity Period ends on the later of:
(a) the date of expiration or lapsing of the last patent
right in the patents and patent applications set out in the
license agreement with Novogen; or
(b) the date of expiration or lapsing of the last licensed
patent right which MEPL would, but for the license granted in
the license agreement, infringe in any country in the
geographical territory covered by the license agreement by doing
in that country any of the things set out in the license
agreement.
2. In addition to the amounts above, the Phenoxodiol
License Agreement was amended in June 2006 and April 2007 to
provide that upon the earliest receipt by MEPL of the first:
(i) approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration
(the FDA) of a New Drug Application
(NDA) for phenoxodiol;
(ii) approval or authorization of any kind to market
phenoxodiol in the U.S.; or
(iii) approval or authorization of any kind by a government
agency in any other country to market phenoxodiol.
MEPL will be required to pay Novogen Research Pty Limited
$8,000,000, together with interest on such amount from (and
including) December 31, 2006 to (but excluding) the
Approval Date. Thereafter, MEPL will be required to make license
milestone fee payments of $8,000,000 to Novogen Research Pty
Limited on December 31 of the year of the Approval Date and on
December 31 of each year thereafter during the exclusivity
period under the Phenoxodiol License Agreement.
No license fees have been accrued in respect of phenoxodiol at
June 30, 2009.
Termination
The Company may terminate the Phenoxodiol License Agreement at
any time, by giving three months notice to Novogen. The
Company may also terminate the Phenoxodiol License Agreement if
Novogen commits a breach of any of its material obligations
under the Phenoxodiol License Agreement, becomes the subject of
certain bankruptcy proceedings or is unable to lawfully perform
its obligations. Novogen may terminate the Phenoxodiol License
Agreement if the Company commits a breach of any of the
Companys material obligations thereunder, becomes the
subject of certain bankruptcy proceedings or is unable to
lawfully perform its obligations. Novogen may also terminate the
Phenoxodiol License Agreement immediately if a change of
control, as defined therein, occurs without the consent of
Novogen.
The
License Agreement for NV-196 and NV-143
In May 2006, MEPL entered into a second license agreement with
Novogen Research for two oncology compounds, NV-196 and NV-143
(the NV-196 and NV-143 License Agreement). Pursuant
to the terms of the
NV-196 and
NV-143 License Agreement, Novogen Research has granted MEPL a
world-wide, non-transferable license under its patents and
patent applications and in its licensed know-how to conduct
clinical trials and commercialize and distribute NV-196 and
NV-143 products. The NV-196 and NV-143 License Agreement is
15
exclusive until the expiration or lapsing of the last relevant
Novogen patents or patent applications in the world and
thereafter is non-exclusive. The NV-196 and NV-143 License
Agreement grants the Company the right to make, have made,
market, distribute, sell, hire or otherwise dispose of NV-196
and NV-143 products in the field of prevention treatment or cure
of cancer in humans by pharmaceuticals delivered in all forms
except topical applications.
The Company is obligated to continue current and undertake
further clinical trials of NV-196 and NV-143, and is responsible
for paying for all materials necessary to conduct clinical
trials. The Company must conduct all such trials diligently and
professionally. The Company must use reasonable endeavors to
design and conduct clinical trials to generate outcomes which
are calculated to result in regulatory approval of NV-196 and
NV-143 products. The Company must also keep proper records of
all clinical trials and allow Novogen to inspect those records.
All intellectual property rights in the compounds, trial
protocols, results of clinical trials, case report forms and any
other materials used in the conduct of the clinical trials are
assigned by the Company to Novogen and the Company may not
publish the results of clinical trials without the prior written
consent of Novogen. Each party must disclose to the other party
developments, improvements, enhancements or new know-how in
relation to the NV-196 and NV-143 products which are made or
acquired by either party.
The Company may not
sub-license,
sub-contract
or engage agents without the prior written consent of Novogen.
Any proposed
sub-contractors
and agents must first agree in writing to comply with certain
confidentiality obligations and to assign to Novogen all
intellectual property rights in the Field created or acquired by
them in the course of their engagement.
Marketing
and Commercialization
The Company may market and commercialize NV-196 and NV-143
products under the NV-196 and NV-143 License Agreement in any
manner that the Company thinks fit so long as the Company
conducts any marketing and commercialization activities on a
commercially reasonable basis in compliance with applicable laws
and regulations. The Company must also comply with reasonable
direction given to the Company by Novogen, act in a manner which
the Company considers to be most beneficial to the interests of
the Company and Novogen and otherwise act in good faith to
Novogen. All advertising and promotional material must be
submitted to Novogen for prior approval.
Fees,
Charges and Costs
MEPL paid $1,000,000 to Novogen in May 2006 which was the first
lump sum license fee payment due under the terms of the NV-196
and NV-143 License Agreement. Future amounts payable to Novogen
under the terms of the NV-196 and NV-143 License Agreement are
as follows:
1. MEPL must pay to Novogen the following milestone license
fees upon the occurrence of the corresponding milestone as
detailed below:
(a) the first licensed product containing NV-196 to reach a
milestone as described below; and
(b) the first licensed product containing NV-143 to reach a
milestone as described below.
The milestone license fees are:
(i) $1,000,000 on the date an investigational new drug
application (IND) for the licensed product goes into
effect or the equivalent approval of a government agency is
obtained in another country. If this event does not occur before
March 31, 2008 then this amount will be due on this date.
The amount of $1,000,000 was paid to Novogen on March 31,
2008 under the terms of this agreement;
(ii) $2,000,000 on the date of enrollment of the first
clinical trial subject in a Phase II clinical trial of the
licensed product. If this event does not occur before
June 30, 2009, then this amount will be due on this date.
The amount of $2,000,000 was paid to Novogen on June 30,
2009 under the terms of this agreement;
16
(iii) $3,000,000 on the date of enrollment of the first
clinical trial subject in a Phase III clinical trial of the
licensed product. If this event does not occur before
December 31, 2011, then this amount will be due on this
date; and
(iv) $8,000,000 on the date of first receipt of a NDA for
the licensed product from the FDA or equivalent approval from a
government agency in another country. If this event does not
occur before December 31, 2013, then this amount will be
due on this date.
2. MEPL must pay Novogen 5% of all net sales and 25% of
commercialization income for the term of the license. The
royalty rate is reduced by 50% if the licensed patent right in
any country or territory expires, lapses, is revoked, does not
exist or is assigned to MEPL and the product is entirely
manufactured and supplied in such country.
3. Minimum royalties of $3,000,000 per year are payable
following the date of the first receipt of an NDA for a licensed
product from the FDA (or equivalent approval from a government
agency in any other country) until the expiration of the term.
Termination
The Company may terminate the NV-196 and NV-143 License
Agreement at any time by giving three months notice to
Novogen. The Company may also terminate the NV-196 and NV-143
License Agreement if Novogen commits a breach of any of its
material obligations thereunder, becomes the subject of certain
bankruptcy proceedings or is unable to lawfully perform its
obligations. Novogen may terminate the NV-196 and NV-143 License
Agreement if the Company commits a breach of any of the
Companys material obligations thereunder, becomes the
subject of certain bankruptcy proceedings or is unable to
lawfully perform its obligations. Novogen may also terminate the
NV-196 and NV-143 License Agreement immediately if a change of
control, as defined therein, occurs without the consent of
Novogen.
As the NV-196 and NV-143 License Agreement may be terminated
without penalty by MEPL by giving three months notice, the
license fees due thereunder are recognized as an expense when
the milestone event occurs.
License
Agreement for NV-128
On August 4, 2009, MEPL entered into a third license
agreement with Novogen Research pursuant to which Novogen
Research granted to MEPL an exclusive, worldwide,
non-transferable license under its patents and patent
applications and in the intellectual property rights related to
its know how to conduct clinical trials, commercialize and
distribute NV-128 (the NV-128 License Agreement).
The NV-128 License Agreement covers the use of
NV-128 in
the Field. The NV-128 License Agreement remains in effect until
(i) the expiration or lapsing of the last relevant patents
or patent applications in the world or (ii) Novogen
Researchs assignment to MEPL of the last relevant patents
or patent applications in the world so that MEPL may assume the
filing, prosecution and maintenance of such patents or patent
applications. Thereafter, the NV-128 License Agreement becomes a
non-exclusive, perpetual and irrevocable license covering any
remaining intellectual property rights related to the know how
with respect to NV-128.
MEPL is obligated to undertake clinical trials of NV-128, and is
responsible for paying for all materials necessary to conduct
such clinical trials. MEPL must conduct all such trials
diligently and professionally. MEPL must use reasonable
endeavors to design and conduct clinical trials to generate
outcomes which are calculated to result in regulatory approval
of NV-128. MEPL must also keep proper records of all clinical
trials and allow Novogen Research to inspect those records.
All intellectual property rights in the compounds, trial
protocols, results of clinical trials, case report forms and any
other materials used in the conduct of the clinical trials are
assigned by MEPL to Novogen Research and MEPL may not publish
the results of clinical trials without the prior written consent
of Novogen Research. Each party must disclose to the other party
developments, improvements, enhancements or new know-how in
relation to NV-128 which are made or acquired by either party.
17
MEPL may not
sub-license,
sub-contract
or engage agents without the prior written consent of Novogen
Research. Any proposed
sub-contractors
and agents must first agree in writing to comply with certain
confidentiality obligations and to assign to Novogen Research
all intellectual property rights in the Field created or
acquired by them in the course of their engagement.
Marketing
and Commercialization
MEPL may market and commercialize NV-128 in any manner that MEPL
thinks fit so long as MEPL conducts any marketing and
commercialization activities on a commercially reasonable basis
in compliance with applicable laws and regulations. MEPL must
also comply with reasonable direction given to MEPL by Novogen
Research, act in a manner which MEPL considers to be most
beneficial to the interests of MEPL and Novogen Research and
otherwise act in good faith to Novogen Research. All advertising
and promotional material must be submitted to Novogen Research
for prior approval
Fees,
Charges and Costs
1. MEPL paid $1,500,000 to Novogen Research in August 2009,
which was the first lump sum license fee payment under the terms
of the NV-128 License Agreement. Future amounts payable to
Novogen Research upon the achievement of certain milestones are
as follows:
(i) $1,000,000 on the date an IND for the licensed product
goes into effect or the equivalent approval of a government
agency is obtained in another country. If this event does not
occur before December 31, 2011 then this amount will be due
on this date;
(ii) $2,000,000 on the date of enrollment of the first
clinical trial subject in a Phase II clinical trial of the
licensed product. If this event does not occur before
December 31, 2012, then this amount will be due on this
date;
(iii) $3,000,000 on the date of enrollment of the first
clinical trial subject in a Phase III clinical trial of the
licensed product. If this event does not occur before
December 31, 2014, then this amount will be due on this
date; and
(iv) $8,000,000 on the date of first receipt of a NDA for
the licensed product from the FDA or equivalent approval from a
government agency in another country. If this event does not
occur before December 31, 2017, then this amount will be
due on this date.
Minimum royalties of $3,000,000 per year are payable following
the date of first receipt of an NDA for a licensed product from
the FDA (or equivalent approval from a government agency in any
other country) until the expiration of the term.
2. MEPL must pay Novogen Research 5% of all net sales and
25% of commercialization income for the term of the license. The
royalty rate is reduced by 50% if the licensed patent right in
any country or territory expires, lapses, is revoked, does not
exist or is assigned to MEPL and the product is entirely
manufactured and supplied in such country.
3. Minimum royalties of $3,000,000 per year are payable
following the date of the first receipt of an NDA for a licensed
product from the FDA (or equivalent approval from a government
agency in any other country) until the expiration of the term.
Termination
MEPL may terminate the NV-128 License Agreement at any time by
giving three months notice to Novogen Research. MEPL may
also terminate the NV-128 License Agreement if Novogen Research
commits a breach of any of its material obligations thereunder,
becomes the subject of certain bankruptcy proceedings or is
unable to lawfully perform its obligations. Novogen Research may
terminate the NV-128 License Agreement if MEPL commits a breach
of any of its material obligations thereunder, becomes the
subject of certain bankruptcy proceedings or is unable to
lawfully perform its obligations. Novogen Research may also
terminate the NV-128
18
License Agreement immediately if a change of control, as defined
therein, occurs without the consent of Novogen Research.
As the NV-128 License Agreement may be terminated without
penalty by MEPL by giving three months notice, the license fees
due thereunder are recognized as an expense when the milestone
event occurs.
The
Amended and Restated Manufacturing License and Supply
Agreement
In September 2003, MEPL entered into an amended and restated
manufacturing license and supply agreement (the
Manufacturing License and Supply Agreement) with
Novogen Laboratories Pty Limited (Novogen
Laboratories) pursuant to which MEPL granted to Novogen
Laboratories, an exclusive, non-transferable
sub-license
to manufacture and supply phenoxodiol to the Company in its
primary manufactured form. The Company and Novogen have each
guaranteed the obligations of their respective subsidiaries
under the Manufacturing License and Supply Agreement. See
Guarantee and Indemnity Agreement. Novogen may not
sublicense its rights or engage agents or subcontractors to
exercise its rights or perform its obligations under the
Manufacturing License and Supply Agreement without the
Companys prior written consent.
Supply
of Phenoxodiol
The Company provides Novogen rolling quarterly forecasts of the
Companys estimated supply requirements for phenoxodiol,
and issues purchase orders for phenoxodiol to Novogen specifying
the volume of phenoxodiol required. Novogen must confirm the
quantity that it is able to supply to fulfill the purchase order
within five business days of receiving the purchase order.
Novogen must then supply the volume of phenoxodiol it agreed to
supply, and must otherwise use all reasonable endeavors to
fulfill the purchase order. Novogen must manufacture and deliver
phenoxodiol to the Company at a port nominated by the Company.
Title to the phenoxodiol does not pass to the Company until the
Company has paid the purchase price (as described below) and
retention of title arrangements apply. The Company is not
obligated to purchase any minimum amount of phenoxodiol from
Novogen. The Company must also provide to Novogen at least one
years advance written notice of the date on which the
phenoxodiol product will be first offered for sale commercially.
If Novogen materially and persistently fails to supply the
amount of phenoxodiol ordered by the Company by the required
date, the Company may manufacture (or engage a third party,
without Novogens consent, to manufacture) the amount of
the shortfall of phenoxodiol until Novogen demonstrates that it
is able to consistently supply phenoxodiol in accordance with
the Companys requirements. In this case, Novogen must take
all reasonable steps to make available to the Company or the
third party, on commercial terms, the know-how necessary to
enable that manufacture to occur.
Fees
and Charges
The purchase price for phenoxodiol supplied is the total costs
to Novogen plus a
mark-up of
50%. The purchase price may be adjusted quarterly by Novogen by
reference to the actual costs referred to above for the
preceding quarter. If at any time the Company does not pay any
amount due to Novogen, Novogen may suspend the supply of
phenoxodiol to the Company until payment is received. Interest
accrues daily on the outstanding balance of all overdue amounts
payable to Novogen under the Manufacturing License and Supply
Agreement. At June 30, 2009, no amount was due and owing to
Novogen under the Manufacturing License and Supply Agreement.
Manufacturing
Developments and Improvements
Each party must disclose to the other any new developments,
improvements and new know-how relating to the manufacture of
phenoxodiol which are made or acquired by it during the term of
the Manufacturing License and Supply Agreement. All intellectual
property rights in developments, improvements and new know-how
made or acquired by Novogen are to be assigned to the Company.
The Company must provide to Novogen such technical information
and assistance as Novogen reasonably requests in order to
exercise its rights and perform its obligations.
19
Each party acknowledges that nothing in the Manufacturing
License and Supply Agreement shall have the effect of
transferring or assigning to Novogen any right, title or
interest in any intellectual property rights in the phenoxodiol
products licensed under the Manufacturing License and Supply
Agreement.
Novogen agrees to notify the Company immediately on becoming
aware of any infringement of the intellectual property rights in
the licensed products or any claim by a third party that the
activities of the parties under the Manufacturing License and
Supply Agreement infringe such third partys intellectual
property rights. If required, Novogen agrees to be a party to
any proceedings brought by the Company in relation to any
infringement of intellectual property rights in the licensed
products and also agrees, at the Companys cost, to provide
all reasonable assistance in relation to such proceedings and to
execute such documents as the Company reasonably requires.
Novogen has taken the strategic decision not to manufacture
commercial scale Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (API) for
cancer drugs, including phenoxodiol, as these can be more
economically supplied by third parties with particular expertise
in this area. The contract facilities that have been identified
are FDA licensed, have a track record of large scale API
manufacture and have already invested in capital and equipment.
The Company has completed the novation to MEPL of contracts that
Novogen had entered into with third parties to develop a
scalable manufacturing method to ensure that sufficient
quantities of phenoxodiol can be manufactured in compliance with
cGMP (Current Good Manufacturing Practices) and to complete the
analytical and stability work necessary for an NDA submission.
Termination
Either party may terminate the Manufacturing License and Supply
Agreement immediately at any time if the other party becomes the
subject of certain bankruptcy proceedings, becomes unable to
carry out the transactions contemplated by the Manufacturing
License and Supply Agreement or breaches its obligations and
does not cure such breach within twenty-one days notice. The
Company may also terminate the Manufacturing License and Supply
Agreement immediately if the Phenoxodiol License Agreement
expires or is terminated. Novogen may also terminate the
Manufacturing License and Supply Agreement immediately if a
change of control, as defined therein, occurs without the
consent of Novogen.
Limitation
of Liability
The liability of Novogen for breach of conditions or warranties
imposed by statute is limited to the replacement of goods,
supply of equivalent goods, repair or replacement value of goods
or the re-supply or payment for re-supply of services.
The
Amended and Restated License Option Deed
In September 2003, Novogen Research granted MEPL, an amended and
restated license option deed (the License Option
Deed) which granted MEPL an exclusive first right to
accept and an exclusive last right to match any proposed dealing
by Novogen with its intellectual property rights with a third
party relating to certain synthetic pharmaceutical compounds
(other than phenoxodiol) developed by Novogen or its affiliates.
Option
Compounds
The rights relate to all synthetic pharmaceutical compounds,
known as option compounds, delivered or taken in all forms
except topical applications (other than phenoxodiol, which is
the subject of the license agreement), developed before or
during the term of the License Option Deed, by or on behalf of
Novogen or its affiliates, which have known applications in the
Field.
Dealings
in Option Compounds and Exercise of Rights
Novogen must not, and must ensure that its affiliates other than
the Company do not, deal, solicit entertain or discuss dealings
with any intellectual property rights in the Field or in
relation to any option compounds without giving the Company an
exclusive first right to accept and an exclusive last right to
match any such dealing. If the Company exercises its first right
to accept or last right to match, Novogen must deal with the
intellectual property
20
rights in favor of the Company on the terms and conditions
proposed. The Company has fifteen business days to exercise
those rights and, if the Company fails to do so, Novogen may
deal with those intellectual property rights in favor of a third
party provided that the terms are no more favorable to that
third party than those first offered to the Company or which the
Company declined to match.
Protection
of Intellectual Property
Novogen must act in good faith toward the Company in relation to
its obligations under the License Option Deed and must ensure
that all persons involved in any research or development work in
the Field in relation to option compounds assign all
intellectual property rights relating to the option compounds to
Novogen. Novogen must also ensure that its affiliates, other
than the Company, do the same. Novogen continues to be solely
responsible for the maintenance of any patent rights in the
option compounds, which it may maintain and enforce at its sole
discretion and expense.
Development
Reports
Novogen must provide to the Company from time to time, and in no
event less frequently than every six months, development reports
relating to the clinical trials and development of option
compounds, and must notify the Company immediately of any
regulatory approvals granted and assessments made by any
government agency.
Term
and Termination
The term of the License Option Deed is sixteen years from the
commencement date of the agreement, unless terminated earlier.
The Company may terminate the License Option Deed at any time on
three months notice to Novogen. Either party may terminate
the License Option Deed immediately at any time if the other
party becomes the subject of certain bankruptcy proceedings,
becomes unable to carry out the transactions contemplated by the
agreement or breaches its obligations and does not cure such
breach within twenty-one days notice.
Novogen may also terminate the License Option Deed immediately
if a change of control, as defined in the license option License
Option Deed, occurs without the consent of Novogen.
The
Amended and Restated Services Agreement
In September 2003, Novogen, the Company and MEPL entered into an
amended and restated services agreement (the Services
Agreement) pursuant to which Novogen has agreed to provide
a range of services to the Company, or ensure that its
subsidiaries provide those services.
These services include providing general assistance and advice
on research and development and commercializing phenoxodiol
products and other compounds in which the Company may acquire
intellectual property rights in the future, such as option
compounds in relation to which the Company has exercised its
rights under the License Option Deed.
Novogens obligations also include providing, within the
agreed budgets described below, the Companys needs with
respect to secretarial, marketing, finance, logistics,
administrative and managerial support. Novogen also plans,
conducts and supervises pre-clinical and clinical trials with
phenoxodiol and with other compounds in which the Company has
intellectual property rights. Novogen provides scientific and
technical advice on management of pre-clinical and clinical
research programs undertaken by the Company and manages such
research provisions. The Company has guaranteed the obligations
of the Companys subsidiary under the services agreement.
See Guarantee and Indemnity Agreement.
Novogen may not
sub-contract
the provision of any part of the services without the
Companys prior written consent.
Fees
for Services
The Company pays services fees to Novogen on a monthly basis in
accordance with an agreed annual budget. At the beginning of
each financial year Novogen prepares a budget estimate for the
Company with respect to the
21
percentage of time spent by Novogens employees and
consultants in the provision of services to the Company in the
previous financial year and any relevant considerations which
are likely to influence the time spent for the following
financial year. Each estimate must include the compensation paid
by Novogen to each person expected to provide the services and
the percentage of time Novogen expects those persons will spend
on the Companys business, the allocated on-costs
attributable to each person, a premises rental charge and a
charge for asset usage and general overheads. The total estimate
is to be the sum of these charges plus a
mark-up of
10%. The Company also pays Novogens reasonable out of
pocket expenses incurred in providing the services to the
Company. At the end of the fiscal year an adjustment is made to
reflect actual costs incurred where they differ from budget.
Transactions giving rise to expenditures amounting to $2,264,000
were made under the Services Agreement with Novogen during the
twelve months ended June 30, 2009. Of these amounts,
$1,456,000, related to service fees paid to Novogen for research
and development services, reflecting the time spent by Novogen
research staff on the development of phenoxodiol, triphendiol
and NV-143. Additionally, $808,000 of the total expenditures
related to costs incurred for administration and accounting
services provided by Novogen.
At June 30, 2009, $221,000 was due and owing to Novogen
under the services agreement and is included in amounts due to
related company.
Intellectual
Property and Confidentiality
All intellectual property rights created by Novogen in the
performance of the services for or at the request of the Company
are licensed to the Company. Each party also has obligations to
the other party to honor the others confidential
information.
Termination
The Company may terminate its rights and obligations under the
Services Agreement on three months written notice to
Novogen. Either the Company or Novogen may terminate the
Services Agreement immediately at any time if the other party
becomes the subject of certain bankruptcy proceedings, becomes
unable to carry out the transactions contemplated by the
Services Agreement, breaches its obligations and does not cure
such breach within twenty-one days notice or if a change of
control in the other party occurs. Novogen may also terminate
the Services Agreement immediately if a change of control, as
defined in the Services Agreement, occurs without the consent of
Novogen.
Guarantee
and Indemnity Agreement
In May 2002, the Company entered into a guaranty and indemnity
agreement (the Guaranty and Indemnity Agreement)
with MEPL, Novogen, Novogen Research and Novogen Laboratories
pursuant to which the Company has guaranteed the payment and
performance of the obligations of MEPL, to Novogen and its
subsidiaries, Novogen Laboratories and Novogen Research, under
the Phenoxodiol License Agreement, the Manufacturing License and
Supply Agreement and the Services Agreement. Novogen has
guaranteed the performance of the obligations of Novogen
Research under the Phenoxodiol License Agreement and the
obligations of Novogen Laboratories under the Manufacturing
License and Supply Agreement to MEPL. Each of the Companys
and Novogens obligations in the guarantee and indemnity
agreement are absolute, unconditional and irrevocable.
Indemnification
The Company and Novogen have each agreed to indemnity the other
if either of the Companys respective subsidiaries default
in the performance of any obligation under the Phenoxodiol
License Agreement, the Manufacturing License and Supply
Agreement or the Services Agreement. The defaulting party must
indemnify the other against all losses, liabilities and
expenses, including legal expenses on a full indemnity basis,
incurred, directly or indirectly, as a result of that default.
The party in default must pay the amount of those losses,
liabilities and expenses on demand to the non-defaulting party.
Furthermore, if MEPL defaults on its payment obligations, the
Company must pay that money as directed by Novogen.
Termination
The Guaranty and Indemnity Agreement is a continuing obligation,
and remains in full force until all the guaranteed obligations
have been irrevocably paid and performed in full.
22
AUDIT
COMMITTEE REPORT
The Audit committee of the Board of Directors has furnished
the following report on its activities during the fiscal year
ended June 30, 2009. The report is not deemed to be
soliciting material or filed with the
SEC or subject to the SECs proxy rules or to the
liabilities of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), and the report
shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any
prior or subsequent filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the
Company specifically incorporates it by reference into any such
filing.
The Audit Committee oversees the financial reporting process on
behalf of the Board of Directors. Management has the primary
responsibility for the financial reporting process, principles
and internal controls as well as preparation of the
Companys financial statements. The Audit Committee is
comprised of Ms. Leah Cann (chairperson), Mr. Philip
Johnston, Professor Bryan Williams and Professor Paul Nestel,
each of whom is an independent director as defined by the
applicable Nasdaq and SEC rules. The Audit Committee held 5
meetings during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009.
In fulfilling its responsibilities, the Audit Committee
appointed independent auditors BDO Kendalls A&A for the
fiscal year ended June 30, 2009. The Audit Committee
reviewed and discussed with the independent auditors the overall
scope and specific plans for their audit. The Audit Committee
also reviewed and discussed with the independent auditors and
with management the Companys audited financial statements
and the adequacy of the Companys internal controls. The
Audit Committee met with the independent auditors, without
management present, to discuss the results of the Companys
independent auditors audits, their evaluations of the
Companys internal controls and the overall quality of the
Companys financial reporting. Although the Audit Committee
has the sole authority to appoint the independent auditors, the
Audit Committee will continue its practice of recommending that
the Board of Directors ask the stockholders, at their annual
meeting, to ratify their appointment of the independent auditors.
The Audit Committee monitored the independence and performance
of the independent auditors. The Audit Committee discussed with
the independent auditors the matters required to be discussed by
Statements on Auditing Standards No 61, as amended. The
Companys independent auditors have provided the Audit
Committee with the written disclosures and the letter required
by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board regarding the independent auditors
communications with the audit committee concerning independence,
and has discussed with the independent auditor the independent
auditors independence. Based upon the review and
discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended
to the Board of Directors that the audited financial statements
be included in the Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009 for filing with the
SEC.
Ms. Leah Cann
Mr. Philip Johnston
Professor Bryan Williams
Professor Paul Nestel
23
INDEPENDENT
AUDITORS FEES
The following presents aggregate fees billed to the Company for
the fiscal years ended June 30, 2009 and June 30, 2008
by BDO Kendalls A&A, the Companys independent
auditors and principle outside accountants and BDO Kendalls, the
Companys former independent auditors and principle outside
accountants.
Audit
Fees
There were $84,100 in audit fees billed by BDO Kendalls A&A
for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009. There were
$111,700 in audit fees billed by BDO Kendalls for the fiscal
year ended June 30, 2008. These fees were for professional
services rendered for audits of the Companys annual
consolidated financial statements and for reviews of the
Companys quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q.
Audit
Related Fees
There were $2,600 in audit related fees billed by BDO Kendalls
A&A for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009 for
professional services rendered in connection with the
preparation of the Companys Registration Statement on
Form S-8.
There were $23,500 in audit fees billed by BDO Kendalls for the
fiscal year ended June 30, 2008 for professional services
rendered in connection with the preparation of the
Companys Registration Statements on
Form S-3.
Tax
Fees
There were $7,200 in tax fees billed by BDO Kendalls A&A
for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009. There were $5,500
in tax fees billed by BDO Kendalls for the fiscal year ended
June 30, 2008. Tax fees were incurred in connection with
the preparation of tax returns.
All
Other Fees
There were no other fees for the years ended June 30, 2009
or June 30, 2008.
PRE-APPROVAL
POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
The Audit Committee has adopted a policy and procedure for
pre-approving all audit and non-audit services to be performed
by the Companys independent auditors. The policy requires
pre-approval of all services rendered by the Companys
independent auditors either as part of the Audit
Committees approval of the scope of the engagement of the
independent auditors or on a case by case basis.
The services provided for the fiscal year ended June 30,
2009 were 90% audit services, 3% audit related fees, 7% tax fees
and 0% all other fees.
The services provided for the fiscal year ended June 30,
2008 were 79% audit services, 17% audit related fees, 4% tax
fees and 0% all other fees.
SECTION 16(A)
BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires the
Companys officers and directors and persons who
beneficially own more than 10% of the Common Stock of the
Company to file initial reports of ownership of such securities
and reports of changes in ownership of such securities with the
SEC. Such officers, directors and 10% stockholders of the
Company are also required by SEC regulations to furnish the
Company with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.
Based solely on the Companys review of the copies of such
forms received by it with respect to the fiscal year ended
June 30, 2009, all reports were filed on a timely basis
except for the report by Mr. Philip Johnston, a director of
the Company, with respect to his purchase of 10,000 shares
of Common Stock at a purchase price of $0.55 per share, in an
off market transaction.
24
COMPENSATION
COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION
For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009, the members of the
Compensation Committee were Mr. Philip Johnston, Professor
Bryan Williams, Mr. Stephen Breckenridge and Professor Paul
John Nestel. Mr. Breckenridge was also a member of the
Compensation Committee during the fiscal year ended
June 30, 2009, however, he resigned as a member of the
Board of Directors effective December 15, 2008. All of the
Compensation Committee members during the fiscal year ended
June 30, 2009 were non-employee directors and not former
officers. No member of the Compensation Committee had any
relationships requiring disclosure by the Company pursuant to
the SECs rules requiring disclosure of certain
relationships and related party transactions. No executive
officer of the Company has served on the Compensation Committee
of any other entity that has, or has had, one or more executive
officers serving as a member of the Companys Board of
Directors.
COMPENSATION
COMMITTEE REPORT
The Compensation Committee of the Company has reviewed and
discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by
Item 402(b) of
Regulation S-K
with management and, based on such review and discussions, the
compensation committee recommended to the Board of Directors
that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in
this Proxy Statement.
Mr. Philip Johnston
Professor Bryan Williams
Professor Paul John Nestel
CODE OF
ETHICS
The Company has adopted a Code of Business and Ethics policy
that applies to the Companys directors and employees
(including the Companys principal executive officer and
the Companys principal financial officer), and has posted
the text of the Companys policy on its website at
www.marshalledwardsinc.com.
STOCKHOLDER
PROPOSALS FOR THE 2010 ANNUAL MEETING
Stockholders who, in accordance with
Rule 14a-8
under the Exchange Act, wish to present proposals for inclusion
in next years proxy statement, must submit such proposals
in writing addressed to the Companys Secretary and such
proposals must be received at the Companys executive
offices at 140 Wicks Road, North Ryde Sydney NSW Australia 2113
no later than the close of business on June 26, 2010.
Stockholder proposals for presentation at next years
annual meeting which are not submitted in accordance with
Rule 14a-8,
will be considered untimely if such proposals are not received
by the Companys Secretary by the close of business on
September 9, 2010.
DELIVERY
OF DOCUMENTS TO STOCKHOLDERS SHARING AN ADDRESS
The Company may satisfy SEC rules regarding delivery of proxy
statements and annual reports by delivering a single proxy
statement and annual report to an address shared by two or more
Company stockholders. This delivery method is referred to as
householding and can result in meaningful cost
savings for the Company. In order to take advantage of this
opportunity, the Company has delivered only one proxy statement
and annual report to multiple stockholders who share an address,
unless contrary instructions were received from impacted
stockholders prior to the mailing date. We undertake to deliver
promptly upon written or oral request a separate copy of the
proxy statement
and/or
annual report, as requested, to a stockholder at a shared
address to which a single copy of these documents was delivered.
If you hold stock as a registered stockholder and prefer to
receive separate copies of a proxy statement or annual report
either now or in the future, please contact Computershare
Investor Services LLC at P.O. Box A3504, Chicago,
Illinois
60690-3504
or by telephone at
(312) 360-5494.
If your stock is held through a broker or bank and you prefer to
receive separate copies of a proxy statement or annual report
either now or in the future, please contact such broker or bank.
25
GENERAL
Management does not intend to bring any business before the
meeting other than the matters referred to in the accompanying
notice. If, however, any other matters properly come before the
meeting, it is intended that the persons named in the
accompanying proxy will vote pursuant to the proxy in accordance
with their best judgment on such matters.
A copy of the Companys most recent Annual Report on
Form 10-K
is available on the Companys website at
www.marshalledwardsinc.com or can be made available
without charge upon written request to: Marshall Edwards, Inc.,
140 Wicks Road, North Ryde, New South Wales 2113, Australia,
Attention: Secretary.
OTHER
INFORMATION
The Company will pay all costs, estimated at $22,000 in the
aggregate, of soliciting proxies for the Annual Meeting.
Computershare Investor Services, LLC, the Companys
transfer agent, is assisting the Company in the mailing of the
proxies for an approximate fee of $545. In addition to
solicitation by mail, proxies may be solicited in person, by
telephone, telecopy or other means, or by directors, officers
and regular employees of the Company who will not receive
additional compensation for such solicitations. Proxy cards and
materials will also be distributed to beneficial owners of
Common Stock through brokers, custodians, nominees and other
like parties, and the Company expects to reimburse such parties
for their charges and expenses.
BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
David R. Seaton
Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
Marshall Edwards, Inc.
26
6 PLEASE FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. 6
Proxy MARSHALL EDWARDS, INC.
PROXY SOLICITED BY BOARD OF DIRECTORS FOR ANNUAL MEETING
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 8, 2009
Please sign, date and return promptly in the enclosed envelope.
The undersigned hereby appoints Christopher Naughton and David R. Seaton and each of them, as
proxies, with full power of substitution in each of them, for and on behalf of the undersigned to
vote as proxies, as directed and permitted herein, to vote your shares of Marshall Edwards, Inc.
Common Stock at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Marshall Edwards, Inc. to be held on Tuesday,
December 8, 2009, at 1:00 p.m. (local time) at the offices of Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP, located
at 101 Park Avenue, New York, New York 10178, and at any adjournments thereof upon matters set
forth in the Proxy Statement, and, in their judgment and discretion, upon such other business as
may properly come before the meeting.
This proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in the manner directed on the reverse hereof
by the stockholder. IF NO DIRECTION IS MADE, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED (I) FOR THE NOMINEE FOR
DIRECTOR LISTED AND (II) FOR THE RATIFICATION OF BDO KENDALLS AUDIT & ASSURANCE (NSW-VIC) PTY LTD
AS INDEPENDENT AUDITORS.
|
|
|
MARSHALL EDWARDS, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Using
a black ink pen, mark your votes with an X as shown in
this example. Please do not write outside the designated areas.
|
|
x |
|
|
Annual Meeting Proxy Card
|
|
6PLEASE FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.6
A Proposals The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the listed nominee and FOR Proposal 2.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
|
Election of Director:
|
|
For
|
|
Withhold
|
|
+ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
01 - Bryan Williams
|
|
o
|
|
o |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For |
|
Against |
|
Abstain |
|
|
2. |
|
Ratification of appointment of BDO Kendalls Audit & |
|
o |
|
o |
|
o |
|
|
|
|
Assurance (NSW-VIC) Pty Ltd as independent auditors for |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B Non-Voting Items
|
|
|
Change of Address Please print new address below.
|
|
Comments Please print your comments below. |
|
|
|
C Authorized Signatures This section must be completed for your vote to be counted. Date and Sign Below
NOTE: Please sign your name(s) EXACTLY as your name(s) appear(s) on this proxy. All joint holders
must sign. When signing as attorney, trustee, executor, administrator, guardian or corporate
officer, please provide your FULL title.
|
|
|
|
|
Date (mm/dd/yyyy) Please print date below. |
|
Signature 1
Please keep
signature within
the box.
|
|
Signature 2
Please keep
signature within
the box. |
/ / |
|
|
|
|
013YYA